Yep. That the soviets didn't even try and just believed what USA told them is absurd. Almost as absurd as the official story. And that no ever tried again, let alone the people that supposedly did it. The current chinese robot missions are blatantly fake.
I know reddit and other mainstream platforms are against flat earth. If this reasoning is also not open in this platform then people here are lost. The reason they fake moon landing is because it's not possible to go to the moon as it's not something you can land on. For everyone who really wants to learn about it go look into flat earth. For people that came from reddit and are still close minded brainwashed sheep and unable to entertain this idea. Please just shut up and let the other open minded people see this. Thanks
The only thing that trips me up on this, and I'm with you, is where they got the "moon glass" with fission marks on it. Think they just pulled it from the Baffin Islands and called it moon glass?
And on that note, how do we feel about the voyager crafts?
It could be the breakaway civilization can go there in their tictacs or bell UAPs or whatever, but I don't think it's anything to do "us" - as in not NASA or any other space agency's work. NASA/Military faked the landings because they believed they could get away with it, could afford to do it, and having people believe it happened was almost as good as actually going there (perhaps better actually) and far preferable to telling everyone that actually it's impossible to do in the way they devised. Then people would ask why did they think it was possible in the first place? when did you realise it would be impossible? Why did they spend all that money? and kill those astronauts? etc.
Also I think they felt emboldened by a couple of other massive hoaxes that successfully passed as real 20 or so years before.
Cost vs profit. Getting there is expensive, being there is expensive and hard due to weight limitations, and bringing anything back is expensive. Unless you find something of value there that could beeasy to obtain and light enough to bring back cheaply, it has to have such a huge profit margin to be worth it.
One thing Avatar had right was the unobtainoum bullshit part. One billion dollars per kilogram, making the trip, fuel, equipment, manpower and return trip worth the trouble. As far as I know we haven’t found anything like that on the moon. Unless we can find some super uranium to make cheap fission reactors on earth or something in that realm of cost benefit to make it worth it, repeatedly going to the moon isn’t worth the money. The rocks might be interesting to scientists, but the beancounters control the purse strings.
I’m sure if enough doubters wanted to pool their money and fund it and elect you’re own astronauts Elon Musk would be happy to drop some people on the moon for you. But asking other countries to fund space exploration isn’t going to happen. They’d rather buy an aircraft carrier that after a few years service for them they can resell to another country and recoup some of the cost. Anything that has an easy to explain use and a chance for resell has a much better chance of funding than a space mission in the name of curiosity as far as countries budgets are concerned.
They’d already done the legwork and manufacturing and processing for the craft, launcher, fuel etc. They’d already proven the concept and did it a few times and once a lack of return on investment was shown they stopped. You wondered why other countries aren’t just throwing men onto the moon. They’ve seen others pony up the cash and infrastructure and stop because of lack of money in doing so. Any other problem the first thing people say is “follow the money” but doing so here is apparently wrong?
I admire the brevity in which you can express to the world that you’re retarded. Sadly some of us enjoy using the language we all understand to get a point across.
I point out going to the moon over and over for very little to no return on the investment makes for a good reason to not keep going there. You respond I’m a shill. Who’s really the shill here?
Go thump your bible and claim there’s a firmament over your flat earth in your basement troll, you add fuck all to the conversation beyond stupidity.
Yep. That the soviets didn't even try and just believed what USA told them is absurd. Almost as absurd as the official story. And that no ever tried again, let alone the people that supposedly did it. The current chinese robot missions are blatantly fake.
I know reddit and other mainstream platforms are against flat earth. If this reasoning is also not open in this platform then people here are lost. The reason they fake moon landing is because it's not possible to go to the moon as it's not something you can land on. For everyone who really wants to learn about it go look into flat earth. For people that came from reddit and are still close minded brainwashed sheep and unable to entertain this idea. Please just shut up and let the other open minded people see this. Thanks
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMYB1WEMkYL1w1ooMcaOpI61TPNftEdYW
The only thing that trips me up on this, and I'm with you, is where they got the "moon glass" with fission marks on it. Think they just pulled it from the Baffin Islands and called it moon glass?
And on that note, how do we feel about the voyager crafts?
It could be the breakaway civilization can go there in their tictacs or bell UAPs or whatever, but I don't think it's anything to do "us" - as in not NASA or any other space agency's work. NASA/Military faked the landings because they believed they could get away with it, could afford to do it, and having people believe it happened was almost as good as actually going there (perhaps better actually) and far preferable to telling everyone that actually it's impossible to do in the way they devised. Then people would ask why did they think it was possible in the first place? when did you realise it would be impossible? Why did they spend all that money? and kill those astronauts? etc.
Also I think they felt emboldened by a couple of other massive hoaxes that successfully passed as real 20 or so years before.
Cost vs profit. Getting there is expensive, being there is expensive and hard due to weight limitations, and bringing anything back is expensive. Unless you find something of value there that could beeasy to obtain and light enough to bring back cheaply, it has to have such a huge profit margin to be worth it. One thing Avatar had right was the unobtainoum bullshit part. One billion dollars per kilogram, making the trip, fuel, equipment, manpower and return trip worth the trouble. As far as I know we haven’t found anything like that on the moon. Unless we can find some super uranium to make cheap fission reactors on earth or something in that realm of cost benefit to make it worth it, repeatedly going to the moon isn’t worth the money. The rocks might be interesting to scientists, but the beancounters control the purse strings. I’m sure if enough doubters wanted to pool their money and fund it and elect you’re own astronauts Elon Musk would be happy to drop some people on the moon for you. But asking other countries to fund space exploration isn’t going to happen. They’d rather buy an aircraft carrier that after a few years service for them they can resell to another country and recoup some of the cost. Anything that has an easy to explain use and a chance for resell has a much better chance of funding than a space mission in the name of curiosity as far as countries budgets are concerned.
They’d already done the legwork and manufacturing and processing for the craft, launcher, fuel etc. They’d already proven the concept and did it a few times and once a lack of return on investment was shown they stopped. You wondered why other countries aren’t just throwing men onto the moon. They’ve seen others pony up the cash and infrastructure and stop because of lack of money in doing so. Any other problem the first thing people say is “follow the money” but doing so here is apparently wrong?
That's alotta words to tell us you're a retarded shill.
I admire the brevity in which you can express to the world that you’re retarded. Sadly some of us enjoy using the language we all understand to get a point across. I point out going to the moon over and over for very little to no return on the investment makes for a good reason to not keep going there. You respond I’m a shill. Who’s really the shill here? Go thump your bible and claim there’s a firmament over your flat earth in your basement troll, you add fuck all to the conversation beyond stupidity.
The shill cries out in pain as it strikes you
It costs 100K - $1M per pound to send something to the Moon. And of course you need not just a person, but a whole lot of equipment.
so what would be the point of faking the moon landings? o.O
Cheap propaganda