Yeah I knew this. It's pretty hilarious what a joke virology is as a discipline. Stefan Lanka is a great to pay attention to as a guy who trained as a virologist and realized what a bullshit discipline it is.
a) the highest value in existence represents evaluation thereof; hence each ones responding choice within; which the few are utilizing when suggesting economics to corrupt the choice of those consenting to it.
b) ECON'OMY, noun [Latin oeconomia; Gr. house, and law, rule.] aka the laws of men suggested in exchange for consent to ignore the laws of nature.
c) instead of making beliefs; consider the use of suggesting ignorance (choice of want over need). Nature doesn't suggest; choice within nature shapes suggestions out of it. Consent to suggestions by choice imply submission to choice of others.
"Sceinces" where there's multiple opposing ways to explain things.
The opposing aspect is based on the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to a suggested -ism (scientism in your example). It doesn't matter what side one chooses to consent to (want or not want); because the consent to the suggestion is what causes the conflict; so one is tricked to choose a side within a conflict that is controlled only by those suggesting; not by those reasoning about it.
Ask yourself about examples of winning reasoning...
Yeah I knew he had a phd in molecular bio.
I remember in the early '00s in a bio university program and there were lectures on mrna as basically a wonder drug. Everyone was so excited about turning on and off gene expression so easily. Their hubris was underestimating the complexities of changes
I went to see them a couple of weeks ago at Wembley. I was on high alert as I knew I didn't share his vaccine enthusiasm. The nhs Covid pass I needed to get in just involved me messaging the nhs to say I'd had a negative test, which they then texted me back as a confirmation. Overall it was a pretty normal gig, I couldn't see anyone wearing a mask since in there or anything. I haven't done a deep dive in his shit tho, a mate got tickets and I tagged along for old times
I knew he was a very educated scientist who went punk. I also think the song "you gotta keep 'em separated" is low key about keeping blacks separate from whites. I loved their album Americana back in the 1990s.
What if all suggested information (from within form) is misleading (tempting to ignore) perceived inspiration (from within spirit)?
a set definition; misleading
Life being moved from inception towards death...where could it be mislead to?
SET, verb transitive (Latin sedo; to compose, to dispose or put in order)...what if flow (inception towards death) represents the natural order for the form (life) set into it?
mis...dis...information.
Can life miss death? Where would life be dismissed to? Both imply an outside location; while information implies within form.
intention
What if the mind represents a response to perceived reality; which would imply that all "intent" aimed towards something suggested ignores the foundation mind re-sponses to?
Yeah I knew this. It's pretty hilarious what a joke virology is as a discipline. Stefan Lanka is a great to pay attention to as a guy who trained as a virologist and realized what a bullshit discipline it is.
a) the highest value in existence represents evaluation thereof; hence each ones responding choice within; which the few are utilizing when suggesting economics to corrupt the choice of those consenting to it.
b) ECON'OMY, noun [Latin oeconomia; Gr. house, and law, rule.] aka the laws of men suggested in exchange for consent to ignore the laws of nature.
c) instead of making beliefs; consider the use of suggesting ignorance (choice of want over need). Nature doesn't suggest; choice within nature shapes suggestions out of it. Consent to suggestions by choice imply submission to choice of others.
The opposing aspect is based on the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to a suggested -ism (scientism in your example). It doesn't matter what side one chooses to consent to (want or not want); because the consent to the suggestion is what causes the conflict; so one is tricked to choose a side within a conflict that is controlled only by those suggesting; not by those reasoning about it.
Ask yourself about examples of winning reasoning...
Yeah I knew he had a phd in molecular bio.
I remember in the early '00s in a bio university program and there were lectures on mrna as basically a wonder drug. Everyone was so excited about turning on and off gene expression so easily. Their hubris was underestimating the complexities of changes
I went to see them a couple of weeks ago at Wembley. I was on high alert as I knew I didn't share his vaccine enthusiasm. The nhs Covid pass I needed to get in just involved me messaging the nhs to say I'd had a negative test, which they then texted me back as a confirmation. Overall it was a pretty normal gig, I couldn't see anyone wearing a mask since in there or anything. I haven't done a deep dive in his shit tho, a mate got tickets and I tagged along for old times
I knew he was a very educated scientist who went punk. I also think the song "you gotta keep 'em separated" is low key about keeping blacks separate from whites. I loved their album Americana back in the 1990s.
Only faggot shills use the term 'disinfo'.
It's an oft confused word with a set definition:
misinfo=unintentionally misleading information
disinfo=intentionally misleading information
What if all suggested information (from within form) is misleading (tempting to ignore) perceived inspiration (from within spirit)?
Life being moved from inception towards death...where could it be mislead to?
SET, verb transitive (Latin sedo; to compose, to dispose or put in order)...what if flow (inception towards death) represents the natural order for the form (life) set into it?
Can life miss death? Where would life be dismissed to? Both imply an outside location; while information implies within form.
What if the mind represents a response to perceived reality; which would imply that all "intent" aimed towards something suggested ignores the foundation mind re-sponses to?
no shit faggot
So you knew the def? Where does the faggotry come into it?