What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
All life is within balance; yet most of us choose to ignore it; which represents imbalance. Balance wouldn't be balance if choice wouldn't have need (resonance) and want (dissonance) to choose from.
Perpetuating of itself aka self sustenance aka the internal power of energy aka the loss/growth balance aka the flow/form momentum for the form within the flow; which when adhering to it (need over want) also adheres to self sustenance. We are being process as growth (need) or loss (want) representing the self sustenance of energy. You represent ONE part of what's going on within ALL energy...ONE segregated growth potential within ALL loss of potentiality.
You represent the ONE representation; form in design (plan) of ALL flow.
Reason (conflict) isn't about perceived source of reality; but suggested substitute fiction by others aka the suggested affixed meaning within the perceived ongoing meaning. ONE wants to "do" something; ONE needs to "redo" everything aka respond to being done (moved as life from inception towards death).
Always loyal and patiently waiting under the table for some scraps...
Because to use inspiration (need) over inspiration (want) represents each ones individual choice. Neither of us can make it for another, and using suggesting to steer other just keeps corrupting everyone; including oneself. Perfection also is being suggested as wanted outcome; which ignores adaptation to balance established by the natural order (flow) for those within (form), and the want to arrange represents the suggestion of order out of chaos; which ignores ones status quo as temporary chaos out of ongoing order.
Yet not from comprehended flow doing it to form; but from the suggested fear/hope of what other form tempts them to believe is just around the corner. Everyday is doomsday in the world of suggestion.
That would imply perception running out of inspiration...can't happen within balance; which is why the producing flow is ongoing; while the responding form is temporary.
Actually..."Alles für den Dackel; alles für den Club" aka "all for the dachshund (Sirius in canis major); all for the CLUB, noun - "contribution; joint charge"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoR9qqBnfUg
Want vs not want represents the suggested binary (from binos - "constitution of two) of 1 vs 0 (on vs off) aka perceived reality vs suggested fiction aka adherence to self sustenance (need) or ignorance thereof (want). Binary digital implies "who's counting to two?"; hence a sleight of hand for consent of ONE to count suggested other ONEs into "two" aka consent to ignorance. Here we have the intro of RZA's "Bobby Digital"..."Niggaz still, makin money offa those shits"..."Loopin the same shits for a thousand years". Let "looping the same (ALL)" settle in...
"Information" Technology aka suggestion of idolized meaning through means of TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka spell-craft. Now try suggestion of "who wants a sponge bath" upon a hog.
You mean E. Normous Mc Timothy?
That implies ignoring that which is (momentum) for that which was (momentum); which others suggest means past towards present, hence a road to follow towards the future aka "just follow the yellow bricked road; Dorothy"...a suggestion made by the same few who suggest that the outcome thereof leads to a curtain that can be lifted (ignorance).
Momentum aka choice within balance.
Nothingness.
The now for choice represents the responding placement within balance; where you represent the particular (individual ONE) within the collective ALL.
Mastering a skill implies progression of skills while doing so, and the more skills one accumulates; the more tempting it becomes to ignore momentum needed to sustain skill. Form cannot master within flow; it can progress skill growth; while resisting loss. Notice also that as an IT master for example both your life progression (towards death) and technological progression (through suggestion) diminishes your "mastered" skill.
Matter represents mass (a collective body of fluid matter aka form within flow). CAPACITY, noun - "passive power" implies ignorance of being a reactive power aka resistance to velocity. P'ASSIVE, adjective [Latin passivus, from passus, patior, to suffer.] implies loss over growth; hence ignoring to resist.
Secret implies consent to suggested information; which allows those suggesting it to withhold it as a secret from those who want it. ALL inspiration is offered towards ONEs responding free will of choice. Lack of comprehension doesn't imply the secrecy of nature; but the ignorance to grow comprehension by those within.
And ALL represents ONE in energy aka the foundation for counting...ONE can only count ONEness.
Yet perception (knowledge) communicates inspiration for responding choice to struggle for growth over loss (need over want).
Inhale (inspire); exhale (expire) aka drawing ones last breathe allegory; ignores being resistance to incoming velocity.
Marriage represents a suggested license that allows the parasitic few to interfere with the sustenance of self within the family unit (oneness). It represents the way for the parasite into the host. What binds the natural opposites (female/male) is the sustenance of self within balance; hence causing the need for both intercourse and maintenance of shared self (offspring). Furthermore; femininity and masculinity are defined by each others coexistence within balance.
Holistic is being suggested under the umbrella of holism as describing "evolution as a process of unification of separate parts"; which represents the suggested inversion of the ONEness of ALL (energy) self segregating into each ONE within ALL as perceivable inspiration to each other for individual growth.
The change that movement causes represents the self differentiation through momentum into the power of resistance (form) within the power of change (flow). Now why would these scientists fail to point of the power of resistance; when the very same power was used to consent to their suggested scientism? Meanwhile...RAD (Resist; Accept; Direct) Climate Change. Parasite humor never fails to mock its host.
What does choice within rhythm imply? Response-ability aka need (resonance) or want (dissonance).
What if everything sensed at any moment; yet consciously lacking comprehension thereof?
The origin of sound still represents flow; while form (air) represents the response to it among other form; within the momentum of flow.
What if choice of evaluation responding to value within balance doesn't represent assigning value; but balancing within predefined value? Why would a response be able to define the origin it responds to? ONE should question if free will of choice allows the devaluation of self by ignoring ALL; instead the many are tricked to reason about the suggested values by the parasitic few, and how do they reason? By nonstop evaluation of suggested values; while blatantly ignoring perceived value. Why? Because they want to.
To differentiate implies choice; self differentiation implies movement causing momentum (balance within movement) for the resulting differentiated form within. Flow also doesn't leave form on its own; since form temporarily exists within ongoing flow. As for form perceiving and pointing out flow...that implies self discernment aka an individual growth; so "all" the ones won't be able to comprehend flow within the balance of growth (adherence) and loss (ignorance). The resulting vectors represent flows own momentum.
Balance represents the equal value to the inequality of the evaluating choice within. What most ignore is that choice represents the highest value of ONE within ALL value...aka a finite growth potential within infinite value offered. We are tricked to count suggested value; which those suggesting it leverage as cost (hence burying our evaluation under exponential debt); while we ignore having "free" will of choice. Life doesn't represent a cost; but ONEs opportunity within ALL to grow. The responsibility tied to this represents the choice to resist ignoring needed growth for wanted loss. And how do most respond to reading this? "But I don't want to loose..."Et voilà; there's the resulting conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by ones ignorance of need.
Doesn't energy imply if/then? Doesn't nothing imply choice to ignore everything? Doesn't whenever imply momentum anyway?