Sure there are a few morons who don't know any better and fell for it, but the vast majority of the posters want to destroy the achievements of the white man and make anyone associated with conspiracies look like a looney tune.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
a) matter (temporary form) represents response to ongoing flow aka formed out of flow. How? Flow causing momentum (balance) for the responding choice of form to sustain self temporarily within the ongoing.
b) compare time as perceived ongoing measurement of form responding to flow (tick; tick; tick...) with time suggested as past; present and future aka three affixed states that deceive those who consent to them to ignore the ever changing moment(um).
c) flow represents force of velocity; form represents force of resistance within velocity.
What causes separation? Flow applied to everything (potentiality) causes differentiated form (potential) within itself. Why? Because applying loss (flow) to the potentiality of energy: causes a momentum within which temporary growth (form) responds to the balance within ongoing loss, and loss/growth represents the internal power of energy aka its self sustenance.
I don't believe in a big crunch, though I do believe in heaven and earth fervently melting and fleeing away and being made new. I've always said flat earth as IFERS teaches it is dead, and can only work with total realignment and redefinition. In this sense we might use the word "flat" to describe an effect that occurs from light warping. Plus, the fact that our eyes are 3D means that we will continue to perceive higher dimensions (and lensing too) as 2D only, until we can interpret the full dimensionality; so I think that explains the visual plane you describe.
While I agree with you in rejecting the time bubble, I don't get planar eternity from that. The word eternity is poor anyway. I have no problem with M theory describing the cosmos as 10-dimensional (or isomorphically 11-dimensional), and that would be the brane I attribute to the word eternity. However, time itself appears 1-dimensional, though I think a second temporal dimension is curled within the Planck instant, so time could easily become planar and thus differently arrowed (though never arrowed against itself, and never motionless for creatures). But true eternity is spatiotemporal, not temporal.
The insight about defining cores as a form of black holes is valid; black holes as currently defined are almost entirely malevolent, but the definition is very flaccid and also doesn't account for a white hole at all, so there may be a larger class that can still be called "black hole" and have some beneficence, as Hawking hinted. However, it boggles my mind to try to unfold (flatten) more than one black hole at a time. It would be like trying to invert upon multiple points at infinity at the same time. Maybe you can link me to a geometry where that is meaningful. Maybe we could go back to Riemann zeta zeros, because the infinity of them are all one in polar coordinates?
Also, on the sphere earth, all roads lead to your antipode, so, in the curved universe, all light rays ultimately come from your antipode in the extra dimensions. This fact is as astonishing as its repression. Getting people to stop thinking of themselves as in a bubble and to start thinking of themselves as being in a curved world where there's more than one valid way to get long distances is an important paradigm shift. But then that speaks against classical flat earth too.
That implies fear for outcome; while ignoring being within momentum (balance within); which causes lack of understanding about origin. Both origin (inception) and outcome (death) are within the ongoing (eternal) same.
Avoidance represents ignorance of response (choice to balance).
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form.] implies temporary formed out of ongoing flow; while life implies temporary momentum in-between being moved from inception towards death.
Human doesn't represent eternal; AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] does. Both terms (human and animal) are suggested to deceive us to ignore being animated form by animating flow.
Potential (growth of form) represents resistance to potentiality (loss through flow). Each of us represents temporary possibility within infinite possibility; while impossible represents the suggested inversion aka "not" possible; based on ignoring perceived everything for suggested nothing.
We only perceive it as a path; because we consent to suggested past; present and future aka three points of measurement. Understanding ones position within momentum (balance) of movement (tick; tick; tick...) changes perception of path (towards) to momentum (within); which in return defines choice as responsibility (until).
Energy to loss (flow) to momentum (balance) to growth (form). Being directed by (flow) causes choice of direction within (form). Choice of form requires directions to evaluate movement within balance; while energy processes loss/growth internally for balance. Therefore balance doesn't have any direction issues; only the choice within balance that responds to balance needs to perceive directions.
Direction is limited to choice.
A picture is called a captured moment; a movie is called a motion picture. An even more obvious sleight of hand represents mo-cap aka motion capturing. The so called past represents ignoring that which is (momentum) for that which was; which we mentally capture within conscious memory (misusing ram as a hard-drive by filling it up with information).
When you look at the past; you're remembering aka responding to your own memory of that which was; while ignoring that which is. Adding to this self corruption come two more a) every one having a different understanding of what they're perceiving; which corrupts others when suggesting to exchange memories with them and b) our favorite little parasites who industrialized not just the memorized past; but also propagate the suggested future, and ruthlessly corrupt the ever changing moment with a present they define by suggestion of both past and future.
One doesn't need to remember; one is tempted to want to remember; and the ego caused by consenting to uphold idolized meaning (suggested words) puts that temptation as a self restriction upon both comprehension and perception right into our conscious memory. What one needs to do is respond to balance by choice aka adapting to the momentum; while resisting the temptation to want to capture it.
This is for example why the parasitic few selling flowers to the ignorant many...instead of learning/teaching ourselves about momentum through perceived temporary beauty; we idolize the beauty by worshiping dying flowers. All the bullshit we do to keep flowers longer beautiful; while ignoring the very momentum one needs to adapt to; to sustain ones life.
Anyway...altering the past represents the few shaping the memory of the many by means of suggestion. Historical revisionism and his-story itself represents that very tool of alchemical transmutation (shaping) of ones ignorance based memory.
Yet how easy is it to suggest fear; which deceives those who consent to it to live a present in fear of a future that doesn't exist outside their corrupted understanding?
It's not about seeing the future; but about consenting to the suggestion thereof; while ignoring everything perceived.
a) DIMENSION, noun [Latin, to measure]; which implies choice based evaluation of value perceived within balance (momentum of motion); hence as form within flow, so eternal represents flow; while dimension represents form.
b) the "re" in re-entrance is interesting; since flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death)...exit form equals entrance flow; while response of choice becomes impulse of balance for choice of others...all at the same moment (um). Great stuff.
So bubble represents momentum of (eternal) flow; while visually represents evaluation by choice of form within the momentum bubble. Flow has no visuals; form only form makes the consequences of flow visible. Without form; there's no perceivable communication of visuals.
The closest visual example for flow could be the base-line of a sinus curvature aka the ongoing potentiality for the temporary growth of potential within.