a) count to six million or until you question consenting to any suggested numbers...especially as ONE within ALL.
b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray, radiate, etc.] What if the radius of form (life) represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death), and radiating form outwards within flow represents sustenance of self (blood); shared among others (bloodline)?
c) what if agree vs disagree represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to a suggestion (numbers)? Why consent by choice to a suggested conflict by the choice of others; when choice represents the response to balance?
d) SITUA'TION, noun - "position; location in respect to something else". What has more value...being choice (free will) within balance (need/want) or choice vs choice (want vs not want)?
What if choice represents evaluation in response to the only value of balance? What if there can't be a higher value than evaluation?
e) what are the ramifications for the few if the many (how many is irrelevant) are culled? Does the few controlling the many dynamic change at all?
Doesn't "every single time" imply your consent to that which you evaluate as "sucking"?
aspie
Look underneath the Asberger story and you can find an internationalist; anti-human parasite called chaskel leib kanner; suggesting and mass propagating the autism belief system.
a) count to six million or until you question consenting to any suggested numbers...especially as ONE within ALL.
b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray, radiate, etc.] What if the radius of form (life) represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death), and radiating form outwards within flow represents sustenance of self (blood); shared among others (bloodline)?
c) what if agree vs disagree represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to a suggestion (numbers)? Why consent by choice to a suggested conflict by the choice of others; when choice represents the response to balance?
d) SITUA'TION, noun - "position; location in respect to something else". What has more value...being choice (free will) within balance (need/want) or choice vs choice (want vs not want)?
What if choice represents evaluation in response to the only value of balance? What if there can't be a higher value than evaluation?
e) what are the ramifications for the few if the many (how many is irrelevant) are culled? Does the few controlling the many dynamic change at all?
Shut up, aspie. Your posts suck every single time.
Doesn't "every single time" imply your consent to that which you evaluate as "sucking"?
Look underneath the Asberger story and you can find an internationalist; anti-human parasite called chaskel leib kanner; suggesting and mass propagating the autism belief system.