17
Comments (13)
sorted by:
5
planetcommander 5 points ago +5 / -0

Microscopy has shown graphene in both. If the recent info about graphene hydroxide is correct, then the graphene is the true killer.

4
KabbalahSpellBreaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

They do the same shit with a different delivery system. There was a deliberate misinformation campaign to get retarded boomers to think the JJ was a traditional vaccine. It worked, I can't count how many times people have tried to tell me this

3
udevi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not everyone cares, but J&J was one of the ones to have fetal cell lines in the actual jab.

2
Mad_King_Kalak 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why it was reeled back a bit, just my theory, because being made with aborted babies the religious had a very reasonable shot at an exemption, and thus they didn't want it to be the main shot everybody was pushed to get.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they are all dangerous and leading to side effects. But of the three I think J&J is probably the safest. Of course you'll still have to get a Pfizer clotshot booster.

4
Renzus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wasn't J&J the first one to give clots? Not to mention their cancer causing baby powder and sunscreen.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

First one to be reported on for clots because they are pushing mRNA.

I don't know the exact ratio of J&J (Jannsen) vs Pfizer vs Moderna shots but here is the breakdown of myocarditis by shot (bottom right chart): https://openvaers.com/covid-data/myo-pericarditis

There is also one for heart attacks: https://openvaers.com/covid-data/cardiac

Roughly speaking I think in terms of danger from most dangerous to least dangerous: Moderna - Pfizer - J&J

And to be honest, Pfizer is probably just covered up more than Moderna due to the size of their pocketbooks.

1
TheAwakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

They paid biggest fine in history for paying off doctors and falsifying medical data

And plenty of whistleblowers in pfizer these last 2 years saying they ignore data

2
WindyJibbz 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I was forced at gunpoint to take the juice, i would want to take the one they say is the worst and most dangerous.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a different technology. AZ and JNJ are both DNA modification tech. PFE and MRNA are mRNA.

2
ImBillCurtis 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re both adenovirus vectors.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
factdigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Janssen (J&J) vaccine a s non-replicating viral vector, it is a DNA genome vaccine that transcribes to mRNA inside the cell.

So basically a mRNA vaccine with an extra step, just like AstraZeneca:

"It is important to note, the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine does NOT contain SARS-CoV-2 and cannot give an individual COVID-19.24 Additionally, the genetic material delivered by the viral vector does not integrate into a person’s DNA.9, 25 The DNA genome of the adenoviral vector is delivered to the nucleus and stays there epichromosomally (i.e. adenoviral vectors lack the machinery to integrate their genome into the host chromosomes, and hence are classified as non-integrating vectors). After the gene coding for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is transcribed, the mRNA goes to the cytoplasm where it is translated into the spike protein which is then further processed. All these steps are executed by the host cell machinery."

https://www.janssenmd.com/janssen-covid19-vaccine/pharmacology/mechanism-of-action/mechanism-of-action-of-the-janssen-covid19-vaccine