Matter is not constant. Matter and energy are both distortions of space time, and are interchangeable. They are continuously popping in and out of existence. Just look at hawking radiation, where a particle-antiparticle pair spontaneously springs into existence at the event horizon of a black hole and one falls in while the other escapes.
It is the conservation of mass-energy, not the conservation of mass alongside the conservation of energy. You have to think of it as a sort of slide scale where you can shift your proportions from mostly mass to mostly energy and back again while considering your masses as simply bundles of stored potential energy. When you're dealing with every day objects and ordinary interactions, the slide scale movements between mass and energy are negligible and you can ignore them. It's when you're dealing with stuff on cosmic or sub-atomic scales that it can make a lot of interesting things happen.
Matter has a baseline quantity of energy that you can completely convert it into. For example, combining a positron and an electron will totally eradicate both and release all of their rest mass as thermal energy. Mass-energy conversion is how nuclear power is possible.
Hawking radiation should be pretty easy to find info on. I think he won a Nobel for that.
To put it simply, hawking radiation is how black holes lose energy and eventually evaporate.
The event horizon is basically a distance from the center of a black hole at which anything that gets close will fall into the hole while anything that doesn't cross the line still has a chance to escape. The theory is that space itself is constantly in flux, with particle-antiparticle pairs constantly forming and immediately eradicating themselves everywhere. When one of these pairs forms at the event horizon, one of the particles is able to escape while the other falls into the black hole, chipping away at the matter therein. The escaping particle then carries some energy from the black hole out into space in the form of kinetic energy.
SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). + TIME (tick; tick; tick...) aka forms measurement of the ongoing flow that defines being the formed response to it.
How to distort this? By suggestion one to consent to ignore ongoing movement for affixed states (past; present and future); which cannot exist within the ever changing moment(um) of ongoing motion. That momentum of flow represents the balance for the responding free will of choice by form aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Matter and energy are interchangeable.
Energy (ALL potentiality) causing internal loss (flow); which causes within its momentum the internal growth (ONEs potential) of form (matter).
Interchange represents within (form) change (flow). All suggested words and languages represent the suggested tool of mass distortion for ONEs comprehension towards ALL perceived. The few use suggestion of idolized meaning to racketeer the ignorance of the many towards a system that communicates meaning by moving all within; which we perceive as inspiration to respond to by choice...not to suggested choices of others.
What if meaningless represents ONEs lack of understanding of ALL perceived?
word
Does nature use words to communicate itself? How does a forest communicate itself to all the life-forms within?
waste
a) within energy...where would waste go?
b) WASTE, verb transitive - "to diminish by gradual dissipation or loss". What if flow (loss) diminishes form (growth) within; and what if we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
everyone
What differentiates ALL existence into each individual ONE within?
time
Does believing affixed states (past; present; future) ignore ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...)?
Matter is not constant. Matter and energy are both distortions of space time, and are interchangeable. They are continuously popping in and out of existence. Just look at hawking radiation, where a particle-antiparticle pair spontaneously springs into existence at the event horizon of a black hole and one falls in while the other escapes.
Energy is not conserved in our universe. This is simply an approximation that is used because it is true in most small scale scenarios.
Look up Noether’s theorem for the math
It is the conservation of mass-energy, not the conservation of mass alongside the conservation of energy. You have to think of it as a sort of slide scale where you can shift your proportions from mostly mass to mostly energy and back again while considering your masses as simply bundles of stored potential energy. When you're dealing with every day objects and ordinary interactions, the slide scale movements between mass and energy are negligible and you can ignore them. It's when you're dealing with stuff on cosmic or sub-atomic scales that it can make a lot of interesting things happen.
Matter has a baseline quantity of energy that you can completely convert it into. For example, combining a positron and an electron will totally eradicate both and release all of their rest mass as thermal energy. Mass-energy conversion is how nuclear power is possible.
Hawking radiation should be pretty easy to find info on. I think he won a Nobel for that.
To put it simply, hawking radiation is how black holes lose energy and eventually evaporate.
The event horizon is basically a distance from the center of a black hole at which anything that gets close will fall into the hole while anything that doesn't cross the line still has a chance to escape. The theory is that space itself is constantly in flux, with particle-antiparticle pairs constantly forming and immediately eradicating themselves everywhere. When one of these pairs forms at the event horizon, one of the particles is able to escape while the other falls into the black hole, chipping away at the matter therein. The escaping particle then carries some energy from the black hole out into space in the form of kinetic energy.
SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). + TIME (tick; tick; tick...) aka forms measurement of the ongoing flow that defines being the formed response to it.
How to distort this? By suggestion one to consent to ignore ongoing movement for affixed states (past; present and future); which cannot exist within the ever changing moment(um) of ongoing motion. That momentum of flow represents the balance for the responding free will of choice by form aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Energy (ALL potentiality) causing internal loss (flow); which causes within its momentum the internal growth (ONEs potential) of form (matter).
Interchange represents within (form) change (flow). All suggested words and languages represent the suggested tool of mass distortion for ONEs comprehension towards ALL perceived. The few use suggestion of idolized meaning to racketeer the ignorance of the many towards a system that communicates meaning by moving all within; which we perceive as inspiration to respond to by choice...not to suggested choices of others.
What a meaningless word salad. Thanks for wasting everyone's time.
What if meaningless represents ONEs lack of understanding of ALL perceived?
Does nature use words to communicate itself? How does a forest communicate itself to all the life-forms within?
a) within energy...where would waste go?
b) WASTE, verb transitive - "to diminish by gradual dissipation or loss". What if flow (loss) diminishes form (growth) within; and what if we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
What differentiates ALL existence into each individual ONE within?
Does believing affixed states (past; present; future) ignore ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...)?