Now this is a weird conspiracy
(nypost.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
No WAY is this guy dead.
He fled, his family helped him, his uncle (a dentist) "verified" his dental records, and the family procured some cadaverous skull that had a bullet wound (likely of the same gender and general size) - which the family then planted.
I would almost buy the official story from the media and family attorney, but then when I try to post my ( I think legitimate) questions about how this doesnt seem to add up on Reddit, I literally get banned on /r/gabbyPetito after a veritable shillfest of hate (from the usual shill army of 30 day old redditors with 2 dozen comments ONLY in that sub pushing the same exact message), and when I post on /conspiracy there, I get shadowbanned.
Obviously, as we all know by now, when the machine goes into overdrive to protect the narrative that means the opposite of that narrative is the truth.
Just for the fun of it Im gonna post a link to this comment to modmail for /r/GabbyPetito just so I know they will seethe about being powerless to do anything about it LOL
Makes a whole lot of sense for him to have a fight and kill her then realize how fucked he is and kill himself. There's no evidence to indicate anything else would be happening. Those things you mentioned like the cadaver skull, you just made up.
All I did was post how it added up (or failed to).
Just my own opinion. The family didnt seem at all broken up about him disappearing, and the parents led them right to his supposed remains in a giant 5 mile nature preserve area, even though that same spot had been searched 3 days before.
There was no body, just some "skeletal and dental" remains. And no gun. The dentist who corroborated the dental remains to Brians records was HIS UNCLE. Other people have pointed this out, like Dog the Bounty Hunter, who was actually in FL looking for the dude for a while and so knows some info about the case. As anyone who has worked in the medical fields knows, it is trivial to procure a skull with a bullet hole in it of whatever sex/age/size you want.
So Im not saying there is any hard evidence of this or that being done, Im just saying the evidence for the official narrative is a little silly, its essentially phony baloney.
Now, if the agency that did the DNA tests (which has been claimed was done) can publish the test details, and they used DNA of marrow from a large bone (that he couldnt live without), then I would be happy to say yea, case closed.
But look at how my comments and posts were treated just for bringing up this shit. That says it all.
By your logic if nobody had any criticism of your idea then it would be flat out wrong. Am I doing this correctly?
👍👍👍
criticism I welcome, I want to be wrong. Silencing me isnt criticism, its confirming my suspicions.