🕋 ✟
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Tesseract
Aka ONE (form) within ALL (flow) and ALL (flow/form) within ONE (energy). Also an internal mosaic; as in "moses"; the lawgiver of...is real light.
What the hell are you talking about?
Look at the animation forming the tesseract. Does the symbology of it represents ONE (cube) within ALL (cube)?
Now consider your own position as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...do you represent ONE within ALL?
That implies both the heaven and the conflict of reason between wanting heaven versus not wanting hell aka your choice of want vs not want towards the suggestion of heaven and hell by others.
What if I didn't fell for the temptation of suggested want vs not want conflict; but adapt as free will of choice to balance (need/want) by choosing need over want for self sustenance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
If I wait outside; how will the nature around me communicate the need to believe in heaven and hell to me?
a) DIMENSION, noun [Latin; to measure] so when you see a line; what's missing? The one who suggested it; and the one who consents to it. Perceived represents value; choice represents measurement thereof (evaluation); comprehension represents grown potential out of perceived potentiality.
b) a line implies beginning towards end; which implies flow (inception towards death) for the resulting form (life) within its momentum (balance), and choice represents the response to balance...not to the suggested choices of others.
Are you high? Who talks like that in every comment?
I represent choice within momentum (balance). Hence when I choose to duck low; I came from high and vice versa.
Free will of choice utilized upon perceived inspiration (need); while resisting the temptation to fall for suggested information (want).
What if ALL knowledge (wisdom) is being communicated by flow to the formed ONEs within its momentum (sack); and therefore ONE cannot hold onto (sack) ALL knowledge (wisdom); only respond to what it inspires (need) or ignore it (want)?
From a different perspective...what if your conscious memory isn't supposed to be used like a hard-drive for accumulation of information (sack of suggested wisdom); but needs to be used like a ram aka temporary storage of information for constant adaptation to ongoing inspiration?
You may have good intentions, but you come off as obnoxious.
a) what if intent (objective) is given by reality; while all within are subjected to it; hence in choice based response to it?
b) why instead of reasoning (good vs bad) over suggested information; you instead utilize implication (if/then) upon inspiration? This way you don't perceive reality as a conflict; and don't have to pass judgment upon others after reading text.
c) imagine yourself facing reality itself; while proclaiming "you may have good intentions, but you come off as obnoxious". What would that imply about you...adherence to reality or ignorance thereof?
d) OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin obnoxius; ob and noxius, hurtful, from noceo.] - "subject; answerable". What if form (life) represents the "hurtful subject" of flow (inception towards death)? And what if flow doesn't ask questions; but demands responses by choice of form to balance (aka adaptation)?
e) if one goes outside and proclaims "nature; answer me this..." How will the answer be communicated?