🕋 ✟
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I represent choice within momentum (balance). Hence when I choose to duck low; I came from high and vice versa.
Free will of choice utilized upon perceived inspiration (need); while resisting the temptation to fall for suggested information (want).
What if ALL knowledge (wisdom) is being communicated by flow to the formed ONEs within its momentum (sack); and therefore ONE cannot hold onto (sack) ALL knowledge (wisdom); only respond to what it inspires (need) or ignore it (want)?
From a different perspective...what if your conscious memory isn't supposed to be used like a hard-drive for accumulation of information (sack of suggested wisdom); but needs to be used like a ram aka temporary storage of information for constant adaptation to ongoing inspiration?
You may have good intentions, but you come off as obnoxious.
a) what if intent (objective) is given by reality; while all within are subjected to it; hence in choice based response to it?
b) why instead of reasoning (good vs bad) over suggested information; you instead utilize implication (if/then) upon inspiration? This way you don't perceive reality as a conflict; and don't have to pass judgment upon others after reading text.
c) imagine yourself facing reality itself; while proclaiming "you may have good intentions, but you come off as obnoxious". What would that imply about you...adherence to reality or ignorance thereof?
d) OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin obnoxius; ob and noxius, hurtful, from noceo.] - "subject; answerable". What if form (life) represents the "hurtful subject" of flow (inception towards death)? And what if flow doesn't ask questions; but demands responses by choice of form to balance (aka adaptation)?
e) if one goes outside and proclaims "nature; answer me this..." How will the answer be communicated?