Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public?
Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all. In fact target them using MSM, to give them credibility as an anti-establishment figure (one of the reasons people think Trump is anti-establishment is because of being targeted by MSM).
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA are the modern day SS for the US authoritarian regime. Most citizens just don’t know it yet. They were involved in the orchestration of every major domestic terrorist event (‘93 WTC bombing, ‘95 OKC bombing, 9/11, etc). It’s difficult to overstate just how criminal these two organizations are, even if they’re just tools of the luciferian pedo power brokers.
"Law enforcement" officials who abuse their power need to be stripped of it. This is also true of those who are posting in this thread to dilute that message.
Tulsi Gabbard was a WEF young global leader in the same class as zuckerberg, dan crenshaw, alex soros, david rothschild and megan rapino.
Yep, controlled opposition. Notice how she doesn't name the banking families that own and control everything?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public?
Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all. In fact target them using MSM, to give them credibility as an anti-establishment figure (one of the reasons people think Trump is anti-establishment is because of being targeted by MSM).
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Do not trust her, she is globalist controlled opposition…
Don't trust her, but listen to what she is saying. Then figure out for yourself what to think.
By all means keep wasting resources tracking me for going to school board meetings.
They aren't wasting resources. It is to get people on lists. They do the same thing to people who visit "extremist forums."
It's just an intimidation tactic, pure and simple. No need to be afraid of being put on a list you were already on.
It's more than that. Getting people on those lists gives the government more leeway.
Just shut up with the FUD already shill.
You are the one trying to misinform people.
Image courtesy of Glenn Greenwald:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F716bdb3f-2192-4c3d-baec-12f9e9fcc49c_682x820.png
Omg I'm so scared to go to a PTA meeting after that infographic! Thanks for the warning kind stranger!
As far as I know, it's actual policy and not an infographic.
I am not trying to scare you. That's just the current environment in the United States. There is much more.
Intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA are the modern day SS for the US authoritarian regime. Most citizens just don’t know it yet. They were involved in the orchestration of every major domestic terrorist event (‘93 WTC bombing, ‘95 OKC bombing, 9/11, etc). It’s difficult to overstate just how criminal these two organizations are, even if they’re just tools of the luciferian pedo power brokers.
Strong jaw, adams apple, brow.
Using makeup and words to gain power…then activated
She is completely correct here.
"Law enforcement" officials who abuse their power need to be stripped of it. This is also true of those who are posting in this thread to dilute that message.