Well said. It couldnt be more obvious. Look at Glen Youngkin, championed by Republicans, considered a massive upset win against the DS. Turns out he is a Council of Foreign Relations member and is pro-vax mandates ahhaha.
Suggestion (representative government) for submission (voting) as the exploitation of offer/consent under natural law aka offer (balance) for response of consent (choice).
Choice needs to respond to balance (need/want); while resisting the suggested choices (want) of others, and consent to suggestion (want) cause conflict of reason (want vs not want).
All suggested -isms represent a rebranding want vs not want; like in this case leftism vs rightism. It doesn't matter which side one wants or not wants; since by choosing one already consents to want over need under natural law aka ignorance of balance aka self destruction.
Well said. It couldnt be more obvious. Look at Glen Youngkin, championed by Republicans, considered a massive upset win against the DS. Turns out he is a Council of Foreign Relations member and is pro-vax mandates ahhaha.
None of these fuckheads are legitmate. NONE.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/162557-it-comes-from-a-very-ancient-democracy-you-see-you
Douglas Adam's laid it out quite well in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
Suggestion (representative government) for submission (voting) as the exploitation of offer/consent under natural law aka offer (balance) for response of consent (choice).
Choice needs to respond to balance (need/want); while resisting the suggested choices (want) of others, and consent to suggestion (want) cause conflict of reason (want vs not want).
All suggested -isms represent a rebranding want vs not want; like in this case leftism vs rightism. It doesn't matter which side one wants or not wants; since by choosing one already consents to want over need under natural law aka ignorance of balance aka self destruction.
Imagine a world where u dont wake up with bad news from mainstream media agenda