You don't think the original publisher is relevant? I think that article is there because of a content-sharing agreement between The Sun and The New York Post and not because of an ideological bent of the latter toward promoting alternative lifestyles.
I'll bet the content was automatically added with a content management system.
Anyway, tabloid journalism like that doesn't really bother me as much as attempts to deceive the public about important issues that affect them. That is an actual conspiracy.
Actually, this originally ran in another newspaper. It appears the publications have a partnership.
https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/3783264/mum-daughter-sister-share-husband-swingers/
So? What's the relevance?
You don't think the original publisher is relevant? I think that article is there because of a content-sharing agreement between The Sun and The New York Post and not because of an ideological bent of the latter toward promoting alternative lifestyles.
Yes that is completely irrelevant. They knowingly partner with the Sun and allowed that particular article on their website https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/i-let-my-mom-and-sister-sleep-with-my-husband/
Trying to exonerate the NY Post by claiming they aren't responsible for content on their own website is absurd.
I'll bet the content was automatically added with a content management system.
Anyway, tabloid journalism like that doesn't really bother me as much as attempts to deceive the public about important issues that affect them. That is an actual conspiracy.