The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, other than that you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts (who also claim there are aliens), and that blurry video is not enough.
You might want to sit down for this.
The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
No response to the retroflector debunking, huh...
Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, other than that you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts (who also claim there are aliens), and that blurry video is not enough.