No one (who isn't a shill) is claiming it's all fake. Getting in low-earth orbit is trivial; you can practically do it with a balloon. That's where all the satellites, space stations, and ICBMs are. But the moon is 100x further away than that. Getting there, landing on the moon (which is nearly the size of a planet), rocketing off the moon, and safely returning is the extraordinary claim for which is there is insufficient evidence.
The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
You know how utterly impossible it is to aim a laser few miles away from something let alone the moon which is a moving target while the earth is also moving. This alone is utterly impossible.
But that isn't even the biggest problem. Its been known for a decade before anybody or anyone supposedly went to the moon that you can bounce signals off the moon. So this reflector in the first place isn't necessary to bounce signals off the moon.
No one (who isn't a shill) is claiming it's all fake. Getting in low-earth orbit is trivial; you can practically do it with a balloon. That's where all the satellites, space stations, and ICBMs are. But the moon is 100x further away than that. Getting there, landing on the moon (which is nearly the size of a planet), rocketing off the moon, and safely returning is the extraordinary claim for which is there is insufficient evidence.
That doesn't mean someone went and put it there, necessarily.
There's a video of bigfoot.
You might want to sit down for this.
The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
No response to the retroflector debunking, huh...
This is utter shit 'proof'.
You know how utterly impossible it is to aim a laser few miles away from something let alone the moon which is a moving target while the earth is also moving. This alone is utterly impossible.
But that isn't even the biggest problem. Its been known for a decade before anybody or anyone supposedly went to the moon that you can bounce signals off the moon. So this reflector in the first place isn't necessary to bounce signals off the moon.