I gotta hand it to NASA, theyve been a neverending source of dopamine for me because nothing brings me more pleasure than redpilling people and with NASA's bullshit they make it so easy
edit: thanks to u/89060KA for providing me dopamine in this very thread by letting me jam a redpill in his mouth. It's up to him to swallow it of course ;)
The more time passes, the more clear it becomes that the space race was just more cold war shenanigans. Imagine if you are commander in chief and the Soviets manage to pull off their space hoax. Are you just gonna let them get away with it, knowing it's bs? Or are you going to try to 1up them and stage your own? The only people who could call you out also risk exposing themselves.
Well, the Soviets actually did get a satellite and a man in orbit first, and you can physically see the retro reflector they left up there. They were assuredly faking some of it though so your theory holds up
No one (who isn't a shill) is claiming it's all fake. Getting in low-earth orbit is trivial; you can practically do it with a balloon. That's where all the satellites, space stations, and ICBMs are. But the moon is 100x further away than that. Getting there, landing on the moon (which is nearly the size of a planet), rocketing off the moon, and safely returning is the extraordinary claim for which is there is insufficient evidence.
The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
You know how utterly impossible it is to aim a laser few miles away from something let alone the moon which is a moving target while the earth is also moving. This alone is utterly impossible.
But that isn't even the biggest problem. Its been known for a decade before anybody or anyone supposedly went to the moon that you can bounce signals off the moon. So this reflector in the first place isn't necessary to bounce signals off the moon.
Gotta wait for more advancements in CGI
I gotta hand it to NASA, theyve been a neverending source of dopamine for me because nothing brings me more pleasure than redpilling people and with NASA's bullshit they make it so easy
edit: thanks to u/89060KA for providing me dopamine in this very thread by letting me jam a redpill in his mouth. It's up to him to swallow it of course ;)
The more time passes, the more clear it becomes that the space race was just more cold war shenanigans. Imagine if you are commander in chief and the Soviets manage to pull off their space hoax. Are you just gonna let them get away with it, knowing it's bs? Or are you going to try to 1up them and stage your own? The only people who could call you out also risk exposing themselves.
Well, the Soviets actually did get a satellite and a man in orbit first, and you can physically see the retro reflector they left up there. They were assuredly faking some of it though so your theory holds up
All of it was fake and Russia and the US are friends-proof Antarctic treaty
No one (who isn't a shill) is claiming it's all fake. Getting in low-earth orbit is trivial; you can practically do it with a balloon. That's where all the satellites, space stations, and ICBMs are. But the moon is 100x further away than that. Getting there, landing on the moon (which is nearly the size of a planet), rocketing off the moon, and safely returning is the extraordinary claim for which is there is insufficient evidence.
That doesn't mean someone went and put it there, necessarily.
There's a video of bigfoot.
You might want to sit down for this.
The retroreflector is not sufficient evidence of putting men on the moon and returning them to earth because the Soviets put one there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Do you think Soviets also put men on the moon? If not, you may no longer use the retroreflectors as evidence.
I understand the coasting thing, I was more saying that just because we have things in space it doesn't mean we put men on the moon, which is orders of magnitude more difficult. Consider the resources required to get a rocket off of earth. The moon has a 1/6 the gravity and no atmosphere, sure, but it would certainly have required more than what they claim was present in the moon lander. The fuel allegedly used in the moon lander to propel it off a small planet is either magic or insufficient to get something of its size off the moon. Of course, we "no longer have access to the magical propellant" so you can't check their work. Just like the HD footage of the moon landing they accidentally taped over. Just like the telemetry data they accidentally deleted.
There is no shame in changing your view on something. You were duped. We all were. It's time to be honest now.
No response to the retroflector debunking, huh...
This is utter shit 'proof'.
You know how utterly impossible it is to aim a laser few miles away from something let alone the moon which is a moving target while the earth is also moving. This alone is utterly impossible.
But that isn't even the biggest problem. Its been known for a decade before anybody or anyone supposedly went to the moon that you can bounce signals off the moon. So this reflector in the first place isn't necessary to bounce signals off the moon.