This makes me wonder if the Pfizer whistleblower who spoke out about the protocols to prevent contamination not being followed is actually legitimate. That could be the plausible deniability they need. What if those "contaminants" were actually secret trials of prototype nanotechnology that they want to use in future shots (not vaccines, but real nanomedicine to eradicate disease).
This makes me wonder if the Pfizer whistleblower who spoke out about the protocols to prevent contamination not being followed is actually legitimate. That could be the plausible deniability they need. What if those "contaminants" were actually secret trials of prototype nanotechnology that they want to use in future shots (not vaccines, but real nanomedicine to eradicate disease).