I do not understand how it's dooming or insanity when I say that the "1 month lockdowns" will come in starting from next year and when people take this shit down after a decade, society will be damaged to a point where repairing the aftermath will take at least one century.
It's pretty evident this is all but an inevitable right? Based on recent events, it most probably is.
Yet if I talked about this in anywhere but here, even anti-vaxxers will call me a schizo.
I do not have a job now, I am now 25 years old and I refuse to find a job under the fear of mask mandates that are so bad that if you go out without a mask people will treat you like a super spreader. This is ongoing for 20 months and will probably go 120 more. If you do not understand how this relates to my situation, what I meant is the situation is pretty darn bleak.
Try to imagine a future where you are sovereign and independent regardless of what shit goes down in the society.
What if imagining outcome (future) ignores one position as choice in response to balance (need/want); which represents being ONE within ALL (sovereign) and being in-dependence aka "free" will of choice responding to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom?
If that works for you, then all the power to you.
"If you don't like your life, change it" is a universal truth. Go somewhere that won't eat you.
Where are we all going then? This will affect all urban areas and suburbs. No place with people will be spared, not in the UK, not in Utah, and most certainly not in Ghana or the Samoa Islands. If you don't have skills to survive the wilderness or an abandoned urban area hell is the only option.
Strike "truth" and try life being moved allows one the choice to shape it.
Universal form unitas - "the state of being one aka oneness" implies being a temporary ONE response to ALL ongoing movement. Both suggested "truth" and "like" are causing the conflict of reason aka true vs false and like vs not like. As ONE within ALL there's no conflict (want vs not want); only balance (need/want) for choice of response; yet want represents ignorance of need, and ignorance corrupts understanding of all this.
Following your inter self to allow your life to change. Want and need intertwining you to step out, risk no longer matters.
Life is being moved from inception towards death aka within constant change. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); life is tempted to "want" to follow the velocity of flow; but needs to resist as form within.
Before choice can ALLOW', verb transitive - [Latin loco, to lay, set, place.] anything; it needs to respond to balance (need/want) caused by change aka the momentum (balance for form) of motion (flow).
Want/need represent a balance of natural opposites for the responding choice in-between, just like inception/death represent the balance for the life in-between. As for risk...inception predefines death; so outcome of life is predefined; which puts all the value into balance; which the responding choice represents the evaluation thereof for self sustenance.
The ongoing movement represents both the RISK, noun "hazard; danger; peril; exposure to harm" aka ongoing loss for form; but also the temporary growth for form. Choice within balance defines growth (need) or loss (want) aka self sustenance or temptation to ignore it.
Matter represents form within flow (that's us); while no represents choice to ignore everything (need) for suggested nothing (want); which then corrupts the length of life. So "no longer matters" represents a suggested rhetoric to deceive us into ignorance.
"So "no longer matters" represents a suggested rhetoric to deceive us into ignorance."
What part of no longer matters becomes reality when you step out on a limb of life? Why argue with salad bot?
Does one need to risk life; or does life being moved from inception towards death represents being at constant risk? Out on a limb implies outcome oriented response; when life represents choice based response to balance.
If you choose wanted information over needed inspiration; you are causing the argument (reasoning) for yourself. I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of self; which in return grows my understanding of everything. I cannot "want" that tho; instead I "need" to keep adapting to perceived inspiration.
For you this represents suggested word salad; while I shape language at will to express myself; not for others, but as ONE within ALL.
The Russians before the Red Terror have Guns.
Libyans were fully armed before Ghaddafi was taken down.
They do not protect you from full blown political catastrophe, only against individual threats.
Also the threat of armed people can be wiped out through speculation of food.
peeps have opinions.
wield, THE MIGHTY SWORD OF FUCKNESS, and slay your foe in the arena of debate, bro.
The ten year perpetual lockdown and culling model is one many researchers are looking at as a base case.
During interim times, one will have to survive through varying degrees of fuckery.
Which is why boards like this tend to focus on short/medium term perspective.
At this point idk any freethinker who denies the ten year model mentioned.
Some people are getting out to semi-free states and trying to set up food/community/resources for that time in this period, and enjoy things a little, rather than be purely paralyzed by the oncoming onslaught.
Yes, they may get wiped out, or starve on the land, so may anyone else.
There's other views that say pole shift and coming solar minimums, ice ages, food shortages, coming up in the next ten years, are cause for some of this. But that's hard to know.
Sure, but people do not believe that the scamdemic/plandemic is the 10 year model ITSELF.
Most people believe that it will take a bit longer and it will take the form of an outright communist revolution in the form civil war or world war.
I used to believe in the hard war model too, but it seems like now the elites DO want to execute the 10 year model by complete, silent deceit, in the same way you boil frogs.
Every one perceives the same; yet each one understands it differently. Understanding has to be grown by each one; and the suggestions of others tempt to ignore growth of understanding.
Also; you exist despite what others suggest you to be. Others do not define who; where and why you are; instead they represent both inspiration to sustain yourself and temptation to ignore doing so; defined by your choice of need/want.
What if society is intended to damage those participating in it aka the domestication of free will and the resulting self destruction suggested by the few as "society" to the many?
A conflict between want (money) and not want (masks). This is suggested by the few as reason and causes by your consent to their suggestions of money and masks. What you ignore is the struggle for need; while resisting the temptation of want. The more one struggles in adherence to need; the more efficient one becomes as self sustenance; while the more one falls for tempting wants; the more self sustenance will be corrupted.
You don't need a suggested job for money under the suggested rules of others; you need to work your environment aka fertilize the soil of reality through your seed of choice. The more you do; the more you understand about the reality you live in; and the more efficient you'll become at it. The ignorance of that need is what the parasitic few are racketeering as merchants of temptations (wants) causing division (reason aka want vs not want) among the many.
All the shit they suggest you to focus on...civilizations; religions; his-story; politics; education; entertainment etc. and all that's happening in result of that represents a suggested distraction for reality under natural law.
Are you from a 3rd world country? Because that's the only way you're 25 and don't know what Astroworld is. To call it a "rock festival" and claim that "demonic posession" happens at them means you bought into the satanic panic hysteria from the 1980s. So you're either a fox news boomer who found his way here from the Trump fanclub or you're from far outside America trying to influence opinion inside America.
DEMON, noun - "a spirit; from spiro; to breathe" + POSSES'SION, noun - "the having, holding or detention of property in one's power or command".
What if the idol possesses the cult of personality consenting to follow it? Who holds the power to command so many followers by the mere suggestion of an idol? That represents demonic possession.