Consenting to suggested "Q" by wanting or not wanting it; allows those who suggested it to endlessly redefine and contradict it; which in return keeps the division between want vs not want going.
The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide the many into reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; black vs white; left vs right; McD vs BK; Trump vs Biden; pro-life vs pro-choice; Mickey Mouse vs Bugs Bunny; believer vs non believer etc.)
It's always the same exploitation of ignorance towards offer/consent under natural law; which for each of us represents balance/choice aka choice representing to response to balance; not to the suggested choices by others.
Consenting to suggested "Q" by wanting or not wanting it; allows those who suggested it to endlessly redefine and contradict it; which in return keeps the division between want vs not want going.
The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide the many into reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; black vs white; left vs right; McD vs BK; Trump vs Biden; pro-life vs pro-choice; Mickey Mouse vs Bugs Bunny; believer vs non believer etc.)
It's always the same exploitation of ignorance towards offer/consent under natural law; which for each of us represents balance/choice aka choice representing to response to balance; not to the suggested choices by others.