And this sums up the whole article: ““It’s a delicate balance,” Maulucci said. “We are promoting mask wearing, but we don’t want to do anything that would damage the public belief that vaccines work.“
If the vaxxes worked, you wouldn’t need to sway public opinion on it.
100% exactly. It cracks me up how they are blaming the unvaccinated for the variants. That's like saying someone that has never taken an antibiotic is responsible for antibiotic resistant bacteria. 🤡🌏... If the (not a) vaccine worked, then we wouldn't need to be "persuaded" to take it.... for something with a >99% survival rate. This whole thing is a steaming pile of shit.
if vaccines worked for this, then you dont need masks or ANY OTHER measures. as soon as you get past the 60 percent vaccinated threshold, it doesn't matter if the rest of the 40 percent doesnt have the shot, they can't outnumber the vaccinated.
And this sums up the whole article: ““It’s a delicate balance,” Maulucci said. “We are promoting mask wearing, but we don’t want to do anything that would damage the public belief that vaccines work.“
If the vaxxes worked, you wouldn’t need to sway public opinion on it.
100% exactly. It cracks me up how they are blaming the unvaccinated for the variants. That's like saying someone that has never taken an antibiotic is responsible for antibiotic resistant bacteria. 🤡🌏... If the (not a) vaccine worked, then we wouldn't need to be "persuaded" to take it.... for something with a >99% survival rate. This whole thing is a steaming pile of shit.
if vaccines worked for this, then you dont need masks or ANY OTHER measures. as soon as you get past the 60 percent vaccinated threshold, it doesn't matter if the rest of the 40 percent doesnt have the shot, they can't outnumber the vaccinated.
or are they just changing how math works now? lol