Both are based on the few using choice to suggest choices to the choice of the many; and consent by choice to suggested choices by choice of others puts one under the will of those suggesting.
This is why government (govern/to control + ment; from mens/mind) and RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] represent the same modus operadi with a different sales-pitch. Both use suggestion to deceive choice to submit to choice of others.
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] At any moment each ONE perceives ALL offered. Another does not represent the source of what your senses perceive; but a response to it. If I show you text; then it represents a response to what already exists and it's your your choice of want over need that ignores perceived inspiration for suggested information...not me suggesting ideas.
your point
Outcome for life is predefined at inception as death. All suggested points deceive towards the same outcome (death); but tricking life to ignore sustaining itself within balance; and balance doesn't represents a point but a responsibility of choice to respond to.
more digestible
Nature offers ALL to each ONE within for digestion (perception to choice to comprehension).
bloating it pretentiously
As ONE (form) within ALL (flow); ALL represents ONE in energy. What else could one pretend to be? Also; if all is energy; then how could one within bloat everything that exists? How can one within something create more of it?
Both are based on the few using choice to suggest choices to the choice of the many; and consent by choice to suggested choices by choice of others puts one under the will of those suggesting.
This is why government (govern/to control + ment; from mens/mind) and RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] represent the same modus operadi with a different sales-pitch. Both use suggestion to deceive choice to submit to choice of others.
Don't use 10 words when 3 will do.
If "ALL is ONE" in energy...why suggest counting?
I'm suggesting you simplify your ideas to make your point more digestible. Instead of bloating it pretentiously.
You are not only dumb troll but also don't know this user. Happy talking XD
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] At any moment each ONE perceives ALL offered. Another does not represent the source of what your senses perceive; but a response to it. If I show you text; then it represents a response to what already exists and it's your your choice of want over need that ignores perceived inspiration for suggested information...not me suggesting ideas.
Outcome for life is predefined at inception as death. All suggested points deceive towards the same outcome (death); but tricking life to ignore sustaining itself within balance; and balance doesn't represents a point but a responsibility of choice to respond to.
Nature offers ALL to each ONE within for digestion (perception to choice to comprehension).
As ONE (form) within ALL (flow); ALL represents ONE in energy. What else could one pretend to be? Also; if all is energy; then how could one within bloat everything that exists? How can one within something create more of it?