The circular ownership stuff is spot on. He’s not The first to point this out recently. Hey I’ll buy 10% of your company if you buy 10% of mine. All the sudden we’re both 10% richer. Strange how that world isn’t it? 🤔
Consider the state of life being moved from inception towards death...what if the choice of life exists as the response to a momentum (balance)?
What are the implications of believing things to be further ahead or being pulled along by others?
What if the deception pulled upon us represents the use of suggestion to deceive us towards outcomes; towards progress; towards achievements; all to distract us from being within balance?
the value of religion
What if ones bond to nature represents being choice within balance; while others suggest choices to deceive one to ignore balance; which would bind one anew aka choice to choice aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind ]
Allow yourself to question yourself why every religion is being suggested by the choice of others towards the consent from your choice? Once that clicks...really ask yourself if choice represents a response to balance or how choice could function without a balance to choose upon?
What if choice represents ONEs evaluation and balance represents ALL offered value? What would be the benefit for others to deceive choice to ignore ALL value for the suggested values by other ONEs?
to change the world with their words.
Then why does "the world" doesn't communicate itself to those within by words? What if nature offers sound towards perceiving senses; while the choice of those perceiving allows them to shape sound into words; which they then can suggest as affixed meaning towards the choice of others to want or not want to believe it?
What if suggested words by the few deceive the many to ignore how "the world" communicates itself to each one of them? What if perceived sound inspires choice to respond; which in return grows comprehension (information) of perceived (inspiration)? Doesn't that represent enlightenment aka growing understanding of knowledge offered by this world?
motivated by them
Towards what? Believing the suggestions of others until every institution with a leader is being corrupted against its followers? Sounds familiar?
the liberty movement
What if liber aka "free" will of choice is being "dom"-inated by a balance (momentum) caused by motion? You know free-dom aka the status quo for form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
What if movement liberates momentum to allow temporary form within ongoing flow? How come that the parasitic few always push the word liberty; and yet the many somehow also use the same word in their attempts to overcome to few aka us vs them for liberty.
We are in the balance of free-dom; the few invert out perception of it by suggesting us to seek liberty (freedom). Believing the suggestions of others is what corrupts our understanding of the most fundamental shit.
I detest man made religions
You detest what others suggest; yet you need to comprehend the temptation of falling for suggested choices. Choice needs to respond to balance; while struggling to resist the suggested choices by others. Why do you want vs not want the suggested choices from others; when you already have the free will of choice?
we are men and we do make things in an attempt to better understand our world
What if we cannot "make things"; because every "thing" already exists; and our choice of reaction to it allows us to shape its form at will? Form cannot make flow, only shape itself within the momentum of flow.
Creation represents the suggested parasite inversion of transmutation...it's not all out of one; but each ONE out of ALL.
What if we are tricked to instead of adapting to perceived inspiration; to first try to label the entire world as information (words) to then reason (want vs not want) with each other about what the perceived means? Meanwhile the system we ignore for idolize meaning is happily moving forward while destroying all those who ignore to adapt to it?
How do I communicate this layer of deception to others? I only understand all of this shit; because I struggled to resist the temptation of ignorance (want over need). As much as I thank others for doing stuff that inspired me; I had to do all the choices by oneself. That's the issue; the few deceive the many to seek unity; yet each one of the many ignores U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
tl;dr...one doesn't need leaders; one is already led from beginning towards end; which comes with responsibility over choice of reaction towards what moves one.
I'm going to cite this as 'sincerely held religious belief' in my exemption declaration.
BASED!!!! Dude is not wrong...
rebalancing. After all their useful idiot followers choke on their own blood.
The circular ownership stuff is spot on. He’s not The first to point this out recently. Hey I’ll buy 10% of your company if you buy 10% of mine. All the sudden we’re both 10% richer. Strange how that world isn’t it? 🤔
How do you get from all of this to blaming Pagans (Gentiles) over jews?
PA'GAN, noun [Latin paganus, a peasant or countryman, from pagus, a village.] - "a heathen; a gentile; an idolater"
Of course...
Let me guess...the Abrahamic Family House?
Consider the state of life being moved from inception towards death...what if the choice of life exists as the response to a momentum (balance)?
What are the implications of believing things to be further ahead or being pulled along by others?
What if the deception pulled upon us represents the use of suggestion to deceive us towards outcomes; towards progress; towards achievements; all to distract us from being within balance?
What if ones bond to nature represents being choice within balance; while others suggest choices to deceive one to ignore balance; which would bind one anew aka choice to choice aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind ]
Allow yourself to question yourself why every religion is being suggested by the choice of others towards the consent from your choice? Once that clicks...really ask yourself if choice represents a response to balance or how choice could function without a balance to choose upon?
What if choice represents ONEs evaluation and balance represents ALL offered value? What would be the benefit for others to deceive choice to ignore ALL value for the suggested values by other ONEs?
Then why does "the world" doesn't communicate itself to those within by words? What if nature offers sound towards perceiving senses; while the choice of those perceiving allows them to shape sound into words; which they then can suggest as affixed meaning towards the choice of others to want or not want to believe it?
What if suggested words by the few deceive the many to ignore how "the world" communicates itself to each one of them? What if perceived sound inspires choice to respond; which in return grows comprehension (information) of perceived (inspiration)? Doesn't that represent enlightenment aka growing understanding of knowledge offered by this world?
Towards what? Believing the suggestions of others until every institution with a leader is being corrupted against its followers? Sounds familiar?
What if liber aka "free" will of choice is being "dom"-inated by a balance (momentum) caused by motion? You know free-dom aka the status quo for form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
What if movement liberates momentum to allow temporary form within ongoing flow? How come that the parasitic few always push the word liberty; and yet the many somehow also use the same word in their attempts to overcome to few aka us vs them for liberty.
We are in the balance of free-dom; the few invert out perception of it by suggesting us to seek liberty (freedom). Believing the suggestions of others is what corrupts our understanding of the most fundamental shit.
You detest what others suggest; yet you need to comprehend the temptation of falling for suggested choices. Choice needs to respond to balance; while struggling to resist the suggested choices by others. Why do you want vs not want the suggested choices from others; when you already have the free will of choice?
What if we cannot "make things"; because every "thing" already exists; and our choice of reaction to it allows us to shape its form at will? Form cannot make flow, only shape itself within the momentum of flow.
Creation represents the suggested parasite inversion of transmutation...it's not all out of one; but each ONE out of ALL.
What if we are tricked to instead of adapting to perceived inspiration; to first try to label the entire world as information (words) to then reason (want vs not want) with each other about what the perceived means? Meanwhile the system we ignore for idolize meaning is happily moving forward while destroying all those who ignore to adapt to it?
How do I communicate this layer of deception to others? I only understand all of this shit; because I struggled to resist the temptation of ignorance (want over need). As much as I thank others for doing stuff that inspired me; I had to do all the choices by oneself. That's the issue; the few deceive the many to seek unity; yet each one of the many ignores U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
tl;dr...one doesn't need leaders; one is already led from beginning towards end; which comes with responsibility over choice of reaction towards what moves one.