Artificial (opposed to natural) Intelligence (comprehension). That represents ignorance (choice of want over need) of perception (nature communicating itself to all within as inspiration); which implies consent to suggested information by others.
classified 3 letter agency databases
How do they sell you on consenting to step into an enclosed environment; a fictitious realm in the jurisdiction of others? By suggesting you more wanted information. Consent to what you want; allows those that suggest it to also withhold it. You are being used to cause the secrets you want to uncover. Your ignorance of choice (evaluation; selection; from french élite) is causing the chosen ones; the elites; the class with the free will of choice to classify or declassify information.
Meanwhile; inspiration offers ALL to each ONEs choice of reaction. ONE doesn't need the information another ONE suggests; because only ALL offers everything as inspiration. Information wants to be consented to by choice; inspiration demands adaptation by choice, and ignorance represents the choice to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information.
probability
PROBABIL'ITY, noun [Latin probabilitas. See Probable.] + PROB'ABLE, adjective [Latin probabilis, from probo, to prove.]
How does form prove anything within constant flow? What if being form represents the prove for coming out of flow; what if choice proves being within balance; what if evaluation proves the existence of predefined value; what if the temporary proves the ongoing?
We are being deceived to ignore what we are for a conflict (agreement vs disagreement) about probabilities suggested by others over what we believe vs not believe to be. How about instead of probing artificial intelligence suggested; we each grow our own intelligence (comprehension) by adaptation to perceived (knowledge)?
cumulative probability
CUMULATIVE, adjective - "composed of parts in a heap; forming a mass" aka form out of flow; yet we are being tricked to look for prove (probability). "I am therefore I want information from others to prove that I am". That's ignorance.
Divide the digits
What if ONE already was divided within ALL aka form potentiality into potential to allow growth out of loss?
What the hell's it got to do with temperature. That usually means how cold or hot it is outside.
Hot/cold implies balance for the choice within. Do you need to consent to the suggested thermometer or do you need to adapt to balance between heat/cold for self sustenance.
Then ya got the seed: it says 0.
The seed of ignorance as choice towards balance. Balance is defined as form within flow; so why do we consent to other form suggesting us a 0 state to balance our choices upon? What if our consent to suggested 0 represents the power to define it for those who suggest it; while we ignore the 1 that matters (form) aka the ONE within ALL?
random generator
RAN'DOM, noun - "motion or course without direction". How can there be motion without velocity (beginning towards end movement)? Energy represents the generator for flow/form aka velocity/resistance aka loss/growth. Random (without direction) represents the allegory for willing ignorance of being moved; of being directed towards.
numbers from 1 up to 1000
What is 1000? A thousand times one. NUM'BER, noun- "the designation of a unit reference to other units". What if ALL already designated each of us into ONE? What if differentiation of ALL into ONEs aka self segregation is needed to communicate inspiration towards choice of reaction? How hard would it be to motivate ONEs ass to struggle for self sustenance if ALL perceived looks the same?
Adapting to perceived differences represents adaptation to inspiration...how's that for a reference among designated units? When you steal the nose of a child; what are you doing? You suggest another one to deceive the child to ignore oneself. Got ya nose; kid! Same trick; different scope...every suggest number. All the math problems suggested are deceiving one to ignore the only problem within ALL...sustenance of ONEself.
What do the magic sodomites always say to instigate their deception? "Choose a number". Consent to choose suggested choice puts one under the spell of another one.
philosopher
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want knowledge aka the temptation to ignore perception for suggested information by others. Followed by what? Artificial intelligence aka suggested comprehension for those who ignore to grow their own; while ignoring reality wholesale.
Fuck that!
pay to use
What if responsibility over choice represents payment to use balance aka PAY (to discharge a debt) to MENT (from mens; mind)? What if "free" will of choice is in debt to the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom...can't be free without being dominated.
TOKEN, noun [Latin signum.] - "a sign; something intended to represent or indicate another thing or an event" aka a parasitic suggestion of another ONE about what ALL means aka idolized meaning. A frog exists no matter what I call him. A frog doesn't proclaim "I am"; he expresses his form by choice based reaction to flow; which in return inspires others to react or tempts them to ignore.
You'd have to figure out all the combinations.
What does ONE figuring out ALL imply? Another ALL; hence impossible; hence ONE representing temporary potential within ALL ongoing potentiality. ONE can never become ALL; for ONE already represents ONE potential of ALL. You are tricked to want to combine into; yet you ignore that all possible ONE combinations come out of ALL. You are believing in suggested creationism; while ignoring that ONE can only transmute out of ALL offered.
Combination within ALL are infinite for each ONE within; which is why the parasitic few suggest a substitute all (technology) to deceive the many to unravel the limited combinations suggested; which in return collectively grows the limited information used to deceive the many. Once again we are being utilized to build the beast system used to devour us more efficiently.
Does one need to figure out all the combinations of what another one suggests? You may want to use a Rubik's Cube while contemplating the question of need...math represents the Rubik's Cube suggested for us to put back together.
you gotta use tricks to remind it of
You don't trick suggested technology; suggested technology tricks you to willingly supply your potential towards improving its use for the subjugation of everyone. What was that mainstream AI called form like a decade ago (ali; caliph; something middle easternish) that would guess whichever person you thought about? It was used to map out the potential of the users to escape conformity of suggested information.
Suggested information represents the spell-craft (words) used to trick each ONE of us to ignore ALL inspiration offered at any moment(um) in motion.
Before in philosopher AI I would ask it to elaborate about a project name it would see, then it would do a bunch of paragraphs of what it was about.
You are incentivized to want "a bunch of paragraphs"; the few farm the ways to describe them to you. The paragraphs can be instantly copy & pasted from memory; yet throwing tomes of information at you; tires you out; and so you need to be deceived to consent to suggested information. The few use these technologies to refine the sales-pitch for the information the many want. You help them to learn to smooth talk the many into consenting quicker into what the few are suggesting to them.
When you use your potential to "trick" the technology; it's mapping out and saving your consented potential; which is afterwards being used against all those will less potential than yours. The few are using technology to industrialize the suppression of growing comprehension (enlightenment). They try to buffer mankind's comprehension by curtailing growth potential.
Their sleight of hand for all of this can be found for example in Dune (the Butlerian Jihad) aka man vs machine aka "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind". The few already comprehend the consequences of what they are shaping by suggestion within momentum; while ruthlessly exploiting the ignorance of the many until then.
The internet of things is already predefined to end; yet it will take a lot of self destruction for the many to comprehend this.
I would ask it to elaborate about a project
Why consent to suggested infrastructure to gain secrets about those who suggest the infrastructure; instead of using free will of choice within reality to sidetrack the suggested technology? The weakness within ALL is always another ONE.
How about instead of going into the convenience store to attempt to use what it offers to make it less inconvenient...you simple use your choice upon those who supply the suppliers, and every little ONE used to communicate in-between them?
Artificial (opposed to natural) Intelligence (comprehension). That represents ignorance (choice of want over need) of perception (nature communicating itself to all within as inspiration); which implies consent to suggested information by others.
How do they sell you on consenting to step into an enclosed environment; a fictitious realm in the jurisdiction of others? By suggesting you more wanted information. Consent to what you want; allows those that suggest it to also withhold it. You are being used to cause the secrets you want to uncover. Your ignorance of choice (evaluation; selection; from french élite) is causing the chosen ones; the elites; the class with the free will of choice to classify or declassify information.
Meanwhile; inspiration offers ALL to each ONEs choice of reaction. ONE doesn't need the information another ONE suggests; because only ALL offers everything as inspiration. Information wants to be consented to by choice; inspiration demands adaptation by choice, and ignorance represents the choice to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information.
PROBABIL'ITY, noun [Latin probabilitas. See Probable.] + PROB'ABLE, adjective [Latin probabilis, from probo, to prove.]
How does form prove anything within constant flow? What if being form represents the prove for coming out of flow; what if choice proves being within balance; what if evaluation proves the existence of predefined value; what if the temporary proves the ongoing?
We are being deceived to ignore what we are for a conflict (agreement vs disagreement) about probabilities suggested by others over what we believe vs not believe to be. How about instead of probing artificial intelligence suggested; we each grow our own intelligence (comprehension) by adaptation to perceived (knowledge)?
CUMULATIVE, adjective - "composed of parts in a heap; forming a mass" aka form out of flow; yet we are being tricked to look for prove (probability). "I am therefore I want information from others to prove that I am". That's ignorance.
What if ONE already was divided within ALL aka form potentiality into potential to allow growth out of loss?
Hot/cold implies balance for the choice within. Do you need to consent to the suggested thermometer or do you need to adapt to balance between heat/cold for self sustenance.
The seed of ignorance as choice towards balance. Balance is defined as form within flow; so why do we consent to other form suggesting us a 0 state to balance our choices upon? What if our consent to suggested 0 represents the power to define it for those who suggest it; while we ignore the 1 that matters (form) aka the ONE within ALL?
RAN'DOM, noun - "motion or course without direction". How can there be motion without velocity (beginning towards end movement)? Energy represents the generator for flow/form aka velocity/resistance aka loss/growth. Random (without direction) represents the allegory for willing ignorance of being moved; of being directed towards.
What is 1000? A thousand times one. NUM'BER, noun- "the designation of a unit reference to other units". What if ALL already designated each of us into ONE? What if differentiation of ALL into ONEs aka self segregation is needed to communicate inspiration towards choice of reaction? How hard would it be to motivate ONEs ass to struggle for self sustenance if ALL perceived looks the same?
Adapting to perceived differences represents adaptation to inspiration...how's that for a reference among designated units? When you steal the nose of a child; what are you doing? You suggest another one to deceive the child to ignore oneself. Got ya nose; kid! Same trick; different scope...every suggest number. All the math problems suggested are deceiving one to ignore the only problem within ALL...sustenance of ONEself.
What do the magic sodomites always say to instigate their deception? "Choose a number". Consent to choose suggested choice puts one under the spell of another one.
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want knowledge aka the temptation to ignore perception for suggested information by others. Followed by what? Artificial intelligence aka suggested comprehension for those who ignore to grow their own; while ignoring reality wholesale.
Fuck that!
What if responsibility over choice represents payment to use balance aka PAY (to discharge a debt) to MENT (from mens; mind)? What if "free" will of choice is in debt to the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom...can't be free without being dominated.
What does ONE figuring out ALL imply? Another ALL; hence impossible; hence ONE representing temporary potential within ALL ongoing potentiality. ONE can never become ALL; for ONE already represents ONE potential of ALL. You are tricked to want to combine into; yet you ignore that all possible ONE combinations come out of ALL. You are believing in suggested creationism; while ignoring that ONE can only transmute out of ALL offered.
Combination within ALL are infinite for each ONE within; which is why the parasitic few suggest a substitute all (technology) to deceive the many to unravel the limited combinations suggested; which in return collectively grows the limited information used to deceive the many. Once again we are being utilized to build the beast system used to devour us more efficiently.
Does one need to figure out all the combinations of what another one suggests? You may want to use a Rubik's Cube while contemplating the question of need...math represents the Rubik's Cube suggested for us to put back together.
You don't trick suggested technology; suggested technology tricks you to willingly supply your potential towards improving its use for the subjugation of everyone. What was that mainstream AI called form like a decade ago (ali; caliph; something middle easternish) that would guess whichever person you thought about? It was used to map out the potential of the users to escape conformity of suggested information.
Suggested information represents the spell-craft (words) used to trick each ONE of us to ignore ALL inspiration offered at any moment(um) in motion.
You are incentivized to want "a bunch of paragraphs"; the few farm the ways to describe them to you. The paragraphs can be instantly copy & pasted from memory; yet throwing tomes of information at you; tires you out; and so you need to be deceived to consent to suggested information. The few use these technologies to refine the sales-pitch for the information the many want. You help them to learn to smooth talk the many into consenting quicker into what the few are suggesting to them.
When you use your potential to "trick" the technology; it's mapping out and saving your consented potential; which is afterwards being used against all those will less potential than yours. The few are using technology to industrialize the suppression of growing comprehension (enlightenment). They try to buffer mankind's comprehension by curtailing growth potential.
Their sleight of hand for all of this can be found for example in Dune (the Butlerian Jihad) aka man vs machine aka "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind". The few already comprehend the consequences of what they are shaping by suggestion within momentum; while ruthlessly exploiting the ignorance of the many until then.
The internet of things is already predefined to end; yet it will take a lot of self destruction for the many to comprehend this.
Why consent to suggested infrastructure to gain secrets about those who suggest the infrastructure; instead of using free will of choice within reality to sidetrack the suggested technology? The weakness within ALL is always another ONE.
How about instead of going into the convenience store to attempt to use what it offers to make it less inconvenient...you simple use your choice upon those who supply the suppliers, and every little ONE used to communicate in-between them?