Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

12
posted 4 years ago by funturistic 4 years ago by funturistic +13 / -1
29 comments share
29 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

TEST (Latin; testum) - "a vessel; shell; container; pot". Question why it's suggested to us to test what others suggest, and to be tested by them? The try to put your answer into the perspective of vessel representing the moment(um) of motion; within you represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow).

you're crazy

a) CRAZY, adjective - "broken, weakened, or disordered in intellect; deranged, weakened, or shattered in mind"

What if ALL self segregated into individual ONEs (broken)? What if the segregation of ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential represents weak within strong? What if flow represents the ongoing natural order; while the resulting form represents the temporary chaos? What if chaos out of order represents the state of derangement? What if temporary growth within ongoing loss represents a weakened state ready to grow strong? What if perceiving ALL, yet lacking individual ONE comprehension thereof represents a shattered mind (from mens; memory)?

b) "you are" implies that choice can define others while being a response to balance? Can you really define the meaning of anything or could it be that ONE can only evaluate ALL offered by choice based reaction to it?

What if using choice to pro-claim meaning to choice of others represents misuse of evaluation; corruption of choice by suggestion and ignorance of value?

c) I'm crazy? You're crazy! Did I just contradict reality or the fiction you believe in while ignoring reality?

fuck man

I'm not into the defilement of procreation (sodomy).

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy