you're one of them aren't you.. hahaha.. cough it up.
Just ONE within ALL or as the sleight of hand goes "there can be only one" aka Highlander aka high (flow) and land (form) or from the Queen soundtrack "I have no rival...No man can be my equal...No man could understand...My power is in my own hand".
I wanna see video in real time of things you do.
I don't use cameras. The last picture knowingly taken was in 01'.
It'd be like a good youtube channel man.
I neither fall for idols; nor do I fall for the temptation to play one for others (so far). I let the consequences of my reactions be the expression within all.
Like, what is this guy doing right now. Picture him in real time.. what's he do.. how's he react.. Like who is this guy. How does he know so much. What's he do for a job. What's he do after work. That's the most important one.
What does such enthusiasm imply for the only ONE that matters within ALL...ONEself...yourself?. Look away from the screen, I ain't there...how can I be important to you?
He shuts that shit off and reads a book. lol.
Family; gardening; lots of martial arts; lots of fixing stuff, and always a moment to adapt to some inspiration or fall for some temptation.
How's he know so much.
I know (perceive) ALL; lack comprehension about most of it; yet resist to ignore growing it, and others seem to perceive this as the light bringer or the bullshit slinger. I'm just a bit more responsible over choice than most seem to be; and it worked out so far.
He's not like the goyim. lol.
If been called a so called jew so often; that I could use it as being witnessed as a jew; which would put most so called jews to shame. May they kvetch for lack of chutzpah.
ok.. what's he saying here. I'm trying to read what you said but it's so complicated here. Like WTF are you saying, dude. You know what I mean? I try to read your stuff and 3 words in it's like.. what's he saying. As my mind thinks about other things as my eyes try to read the text.. hahahaha.
Lack of comprehension cannot be cured by believing what others suggest. You gotta need to struggle to grow it. Being educated represents being domesticated into being able to propagate what others suggested. I have no clue what I'm gonna write until I start adapting to what inspires me, and then it usually flows off the cuff aka consciousness unchained wielding a mean free will of choice.
Use what inspires to write your own shit, and let it shape itself. Let those who comprehend more than you decide upon course correction; when adapting to you. Like for example right now I have no fucking clue which sub-forum; topic or username I adapt to. Do I need to? Nope.
Let's try and picture what he's saying here. lol.
When those who try to capture motion are struggling about those who try to explain motion...hilarious. Been there; done that. Try to explain to me from your perspective if you're in motion or not? Change scope of perception while doing so aka things in your vicinity; some existential level stuff and change how about some different viewpoints. If we are within motion; then whatever you attempt to grow your comprehension by will leads to the same source. You gotta get the laws of nature down to be able to make assumptions within constant change; while having a foundation to build them upon. When it clicks; it clicks and you gotta be angry first at others for all the suggested bollocks and then at yourself for being so stubbornly ignorant. After that responsibility becomes business as usual, and blame won't really tempt you anymore. Like "who do I blame for my ignorance today" doesn't really tempt those with eyes to see...
"Under natural law". Like what.. you go ask some idiocracy movie character out there on the street and ask him.. hey watcha got on "natural law", he'd be like.. whaaaa? lol. Where do you get this shit, brah? So right there, I'm like.. who? lol.
What's the only thing that cannot change within constant change? The rules that define how change operates; which those within can only comprehend; not perceive...now how hard was that? Am I really so high, or could the majority be really; really ignorant towards the simplicity of existing? Who does one blame for lack of self discernment? "I am; therefore I must ask others who I am". Does that check out?
Idiocracy represents a sleight of hand for ignorance tempting insolence. The few are tempted to hold the mirror to the ignorance of the many. Another one is The Invention of Lying (2009). The premise is a world of truth and the one guy who invents the lie causing havoc in it. The sleight of hand is that the few are suggesting it to the many as "comedy".
"Under natural law it goes offer/consent "...Like what the fuck do you mean there.
Nature offers ALL (balance); ONE consents (choice within balance). This triggers ignorance; because those who ignore aren't offered anything to hide their ignorance. If I'm ignorant and read offer/consent; then how do I fuck with that guy? If I say no; then what could I add without showing my ignorance towards something so simply, and if I full talmudic reasoning on him; then I ignore what he said for all others to see. I have like bunch of these types repetitively responding with either "bot" or under substance abuse; yet always telegraphing their ignorance; not matter how inconveniently simply I shape my question. It's being called a bot ten times in a row that inspires me to question what I'm lacking to comprehend. Sweet trial and error adaptation. My consciousness meanwhile draws who knows what connections, and I just go with it.
Then he throws in a slash. "/'". You ever see me do one of those? lol.
I did this unconsciously until I comprehended that I used a symbol to express balance more efficiently. Same with (...) aka ongoing motion. Don't pinpoint me on punctuation and commas tho; I'm flying blindly on those.
Oh.. so they try to throw you some bullshit and you're like, fuck this shit, dude. Right? See.. your shit there is too complicated for the goyim. What we need for this youtube channel is for me to dumb it down for the goyim. lol.
Ah; piggybacking free will of choice for some shekels. By all means. You probably gonna find me later in the comment section; contradicting every aspect of it; because an idol (affixed) cannot express movement. See; I can write so much; because I resist putting it into books. I resist suggesting to others; I neither start threads; nor do I do the whole up/down-vote spiel aka suggested substitute choice. I try to adhere to representing "free" will of choice within "dom"inating balance. I can freely choose up, down; left; right; front; back; through; around; because I resist the temptation to ignore being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death). I adhere to being within balance.
charges people 100 bucks and hour and lives in like NYC or something.
Metropolitan huckster...is that your perception of a "high" state?
don't wanna overload the dude for one night. lol.
Scoffs in a thirty thousand word response; then catches himself being tempted into insolence. I could do a pun on "dudes" and "loads"; but nah.
After hitting send though, I wanna cheat and check out what he said about the pharmaceuticals. Betcha this guy knows lotsa stuff eh.. about fishy things out there, that he's not telling us.
How about ingredient and side-effect lists as black on white (masonic checkerboard) sleight of hands; while alleviating guilt upon others for ignoring the poison suggested? The same modus operandi was used for the "parental advisory" labels; while flooding the children of this world with such inspiring lyrics as "Shame on a nigga who try to run game on a nigga
Wu buck… I'll fuck your ass up!" Hippety; Hoppety...subverting moral integrity.
You're almost like talking to that philosopher AI.
Can you give me an estimate for how long an answer takes? Is it instant? If not; is it long enough for a human to type it (most of it; some of it; crucial parts to it)?
Don't you just talk normally like the rest of the larvals, where it's not so complicated?
What for? Conformity to party line? Regurgitating the information that was suggested for them to consent to? Pretending that agreement vs disagreement (choice vs choice) represents communicating within offer/consent (balance/choice)?
I do me and those who do themselves often find balance in our interactions. Others react upon want; which is what causes the conflicts between want vs not want (reason). I react upon need; and others perceive that I don't try to impose wants on them; which in return may inspire them to also question our collective needs.
He likes to use aka in there and sometimes the (word in parentheses). What's that mean when he does that.
AKA implies "also known as" aka also perceived as; which is in opposition to comprehension (understanding), and in-between operates free will of choice; responding to perceived; while transmuting it into comprehended. Or ignorance causes the corruption of comprehension.
PAREN'THESIS, noun [Gr. to insert.] from PA'RENT, noun [Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth.] + THE'SIS, noun [Latin thesis; Gr. a position, to set.] It's a bit like a follow up expression; an extra explanation tied to what came before).
I'm still struggling to shape language into a lesser corruption by stripping all the rhetorical tricks back out; while putting the natural connotations back in. Not to make language usable; but to prevent ignorance from using it as a defense tool to stay ignorant.
Pointing out the revisionism from Latin to Pig-Latin (English); the deliberate contradiction of English through legalese (using the Black's Legal Dictionary definitions to hide maritime admiralty law underneath the peasant rules of behavior); the unification of all languages towards the English slave language through the world wide web, and the underlying encoding of it through Gematria etc. should be each by itself enough to get others to question their means of communication; but alas ignorance is bliss.
On the other hand; my attempts to explain the above; is what grew my comprehension of the foundation underneath all languages aka origin of information (energy); sound (flow/form); and means of communication (resonance).
I think this guy's illuminati
Illuminated aka in process of growing comprehension by choice based adaptation to perceived inspiration. I am ONE response to ALL that is.
Not as snooty as that one guy.. hang on lemme see if I can find that..."I am a Rofschild" AMA
Know this, Illiterati, and understand its deep meaning: "FOR WANT OF KNOWLEDGE, MY PEOPLE ARE LOST"
Just ONE within ALL or as the sleight of hand goes "there can be only one" aka Highlander aka high (flow) and land (form) or from the Queen soundtrack "I have no rival...No man can be my equal...No man could understand...My power is in my own hand".
I don't use cameras. The last picture knowingly taken was in 01'.
I neither fall for idols; nor do I fall for the temptation to play one for others (so far). I let the consequences of my reactions be the expression within all.
What does such enthusiasm imply for the only ONE that matters within ALL...ONEself...yourself?. Look away from the screen, I ain't there...how can I be important to you?
Family; gardening; lots of martial arts; lots of fixing stuff, and always a moment to adapt to some inspiration or fall for some temptation.
I know (perceive) ALL; lack comprehension about most of it; yet resist to ignore growing it, and others seem to perceive this as the light bringer or the bullshit slinger. I'm just a bit more responsible over choice than most seem to be; and it worked out so far.
If been called a so called jew so often; that I could use it as being witnessed as a jew; which would put most so called jews to shame. May they kvetch for lack of chutzpah.
Lack of comprehension cannot be cured by believing what others suggest. You gotta need to struggle to grow it. Being educated represents being domesticated into being able to propagate what others suggested. I have no clue what I'm gonna write until I start adapting to what inspires me, and then it usually flows off the cuff aka consciousness unchained wielding a mean free will of choice.
Use what inspires to write your own shit, and let it shape itself. Let those who comprehend more than you decide upon course correction; when adapting to you. Like for example right now I have no fucking clue which sub-forum; topic or username I adapt to. Do I need to? Nope.
When those who try to capture motion are struggling about those who try to explain motion...hilarious. Been there; done that. Try to explain to me from your perspective if you're in motion or not? Change scope of perception while doing so aka things in your vicinity; some existential level stuff and change how about some different viewpoints. If we are within motion; then whatever you attempt to grow your comprehension by will leads to the same source. You gotta get the laws of nature down to be able to make assumptions within constant change; while having a foundation to build them upon. When it clicks; it clicks and you gotta be angry first at others for all the suggested bollocks and then at yourself for being so stubbornly ignorant. After that responsibility becomes business as usual, and blame won't really tempt you anymore. Like "who do I blame for my ignorance today" doesn't really tempt those with eyes to see...
What's the only thing that cannot change within constant change? The rules that define how change operates; which those within can only comprehend; not perceive...now how hard was that? Am I really so high, or could the majority be really; really ignorant towards the simplicity of existing? Who does one blame for lack of self discernment? "I am; therefore I must ask others who I am". Does that check out?
Idiocracy represents a sleight of hand for ignorance tempting insolence. The few are tempted to hold the mirror to the ignorance of the many. Another one is The Invention of Lying (2009). The premise is a world of truth and the one guy who invents the lie causing havoc in it. The sleight of hand is that the few are suggesting it to the many as "comedy".
Nature offers ALL (balance); ONE consents (choice within balance). This triggers ignorance; because those who ignore aren't offered anything to hide their ignorance. If I'm ignorant and read offer/consent; then how do I fuck with that guy? If I say no; then what could I add without showing my ignorance towards something so simply, and if I full talmudic reasoning on him; then I ignore what he said for all others to see. I have like bunch of these types repetitively responding with either "bot" or under substance abuse; yet always telegraphing their ignorance; not matter how inconveniently simply I shape my question. It's being called a bot ten times in a row that inspires me to question what I'm lacking to comprehend. Sweet trial and error adaptation. My consciousness meanwhile draws who knows what connections, and I just go with it.
I did this unconsciously until I comprehended that I used a symbol to express balance more efficiently. Same with (...) aka ongoing motion. Don't pinpoint me on punctuation and commas tho; I'm flying blindly on those.
Ah; piggybacking free will of choice for some shekels. By all means. You probably gonna find me later in the comment section; contradicting every aspect of it; because an idol (affixed) cannot express movement. See; I can write so much; because I resist putting it into books. I resist suggesting to others; I neither start threads; nor do I do the whole up/down-vote spiel aka suggested substitute choice. I try to adhere to representing "free" will of choice within "dom"inating balance. I can freely choose up, down; left; right; front; back; through; around; because I resist the temptation to ignore being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death). I adhere to being within balance.
Metropolitan huckster...is that your perception of a "high" state?
Scoffs in a thirty thousand word response; then catches himself being tempted into insolence. I could do a pun on "dudes" and "loads"; but nah.
How about ingredient and side-effect lists as black on white (masonic checkerboard) sleight of hands; while alleviating guilt upon others for ignoring the poison suggested? The same modus operandi was used for the "parental advisory" labels; while flooding the children of this world with such inspiring lyrics as "Shame on a nigga who try to run game on a nigga Wu buck… I'll fuck your ass up!" Hippety; Hoppety...subverting moral integrity.
Can you give me an estimate for how long an answer takes? Is it instant? If not; is it long enough for a human to type it (most of it; some of it; crucial parts to it)?
What for? Conformity to party line? Regurgitating the information that was suggested for them to consent to? Pretending that agreement vs disagreement (choice vs choice) represents communicating within offer/consent (balance/choice)?
I do me and those who do themselves often find balance in our interactions. Others react upon want; which is what causes the conflicts between want vs not want (reason). I react upon need; and others perceive that I don't try to impose wants on them; which in return may inspire them to also question our collective needs.
AKA implies "also known as" aka also perceived as; which is in opposition to comprehension (understanding), and in-between operates free will of choice; responding to perceived; while transmuting it into comprehended. Or ignorance causes the corruption of comprehension.
PAREN'THESIS, noun [Gr. to insert.] from PA'RENT, noun [Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth.] + THE'SIS, noun [Latin thesis; Gr. a position, to set.] It's a bit like a follow up expression; an extra explanation tied to what came before).
I'm still struggling to shape language into a lesser corruption by stripping all the rhetorical tricks back out; while putting the natural connotations back in. Not to make language usable; but to prevent ignorance from using it as a defense tool to stay ignorant.
Pointing out the revisionism from Latin to Pig-Latin (English); the deliberate contradiction of English through legalese (using the Black's Legal Dictionary definitions to hide maritime admiralty law underneath the peasant rules of behavior); the unification of all languages towards the English slave language through the world wide web, and the underlying encoding of it through Gematria etc. should be each by itself enough to get others to question their means of communication; but alas ignorance is bliss.
On the other hand; my attempts to explain the above; is what grew my comprehension of the foundation underneath all languages aka origin of information (energy); sound (flow/form); and means of communication (resonance).
Illuminated aka in process of growing comprehension by choice based adaptation to perceived inspiration. I am ONE response to ALL that is.
Know this, Illiterati, and understand its deep meaning: "FOR WANT OF KNOWLEDGE, MY PEOPLE ARE LOST"