(Truthfully I see this post as a V0.1 and would like any comments, feedback, or suggestions to refine and improve. Thank you)
While I hope everyone is taking what actions they can, such as getting involved in local politics, protests, getting the word out, and all other manner of productive initiatives; I wanted to talk about an aspect of this warfare that I believe goes largely unmentioned due to its subtlety - language. There is something small we can all do to increase our contributions, and that is to be mindful of the language we use. If you want to see some examples skip to the bottom of the post otherwise here is some background:
We are all familiar with how language is used to communicate, but how about the way language is used to frame our perception? New terms are crated to give humans a framework to think within, without terms to define ideas, people at large have a difficult time setting up a mental model of those ideas. Think of terms like gaslighting, when one is aware of the term they are more easily able to identify and evaluate the situation. On a different note but in a similar fashion, the way existing terms are used and combined, also provides a framework for the way people think about things. This is why advertising slogans are so effective. Rarely do they create new words but they combine existing terms to create a framework of thought around their product, to influence the viewer's perception.
So how does this tie into our situation? I'm sure some of you have intuited this already, maybe some are even consciously aware. One of the ways our enemies dominate us, one of the ways they are able to create clown world is by dominating people's perception, using repetitive language to program the way we we see things. And it is a coordinated effort. Remember how every person of note (I use that term semi-ironically) was parroting "new normal" in the beginning of the "pandemic" (another term I'll address)? That was to program us all to be ready to change the way we live. Did it work? Sure, along with force, but our enemies know the powers of words and perception, they would not have had every talking head, politician, celebrities, spokespersons, etc all blitzing us with that phrase accidentally. It was co-ordinated.
"Since the pandemic" and "Since covid" are other phrases the state has used and one I hear very frequently in conversation. "I've put on weight since covid." "Since the pandemic I haven't been able to see my family", things like that. This gives the perception and thus re-inforces people's beliefs that these negative outcomes are a result of a deadly virus and not government overreach. You may even hear people using these phrases so much you use them yourselves, reinforcing their beliefs and eventually (if used enough) possibly changing your own perception of reality.
So what do we do? Well, as touched on, there is a reason our enemies coordinate language and talking points, saturating the marketplace of ideas, because it works. We are doing battle with people's erroneous perception of the world, something that enables clown world events to happen on a daily basis without irony. We must learn to identify these words and phrases, and make every effort to use versions of them that reflect actual reality. Here I will list some innocuous examples I've been using personally. These are easy to use even around the most indoctrinated:
When referring to world or life changes since March 2020: "Since covid" -> "Since the [government] lockdowns" (whether you say government or not, you are making it clear it was not a virus but the lockdown that caused these problems)
"Since the pandemic" -> "Since the quarantine [mandate]" (same as above)
When referring to mandates: "Refusing to comply" -> "Refusing to submit" (changes the perception that this is something we are unreasonable for disobeying)
Some more difficult to use in all situations in the real world, but still important, include referring to people by their biological sex, "new normal" or "covid world as "clown world", masks as muzzles, covid vaccines as a gene therapy or treatment, etc. We do not have the ability to coordinate like the media but if we can all do our part we can work to change
It's more of an art than a science as you need to figure out how far the framing can be pushed for certain people without pushback ("tyrannical government overreach" instead of "lockdown" for instance). But it is one of many ways we are under attack and if we are hyper vigilant we can fight back.
The few use free will of choice to shape sound into words; which they suggest as idolized meaning to the free will of choice of the many. They call this spell-craft.
Our senses perceive movement; which is how nature communicates inspiration towards our choice of reaction. Choice is defined as the reaction to balance; and so if we choose to adhere to it; we resonate with this system aka re-sounding.
If we choose to ignore this (for the suggested meaning by others) we cause dissonance within ourselves. Each of us also represents PERSON, noun [Latin persona; compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound.] aka by sound.
To consent to the suggested meaning of others; deceives one to perceive reality through the lens of the suggested meaning; which in return corrupts one comprehension of perceived reality.
What if the movement causing the sound; our choice of reaction shapes words out of; represents neither now; nor old states; but instead the ongoing source of inspiration; communicating to us by moving us?
What if within movement; one cannot create; but only transmute out of all offered?
Parasitic idolatry of meaning (suggested words); while ignoring the movement defines meaning for all within; hence our choice representing evaluation; while balance represents value.
Suggested affixed meaning (fiction); in ignorance of ongoing meaning (reality). Our ego; the inner monologue represents the corruption caused by branding reality with fictitious meaning; which deceives our consciousness to thing within the framework of fiction; while ignoring reality.
We perceive inspiration; we then react to it by choice (need/want); which transmutes it into comprehended information. Yet want represents ignorance of need; which corrupts ones comprehension of all perceived. What others suggest represents our choice of want over need aka a temptation to ignore responding to balance for suggested choices.
Setting up a mental model ignores being set into self sustaining system; which one perceives and which demands ones reaction by choice (adaptation).
Advertising implies suggested want over need aka a temptation luring towards death.
"free" will of choice represents the reaction to the "dom"inance of balance. The movement that causes the momentum (balance) for form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents the ongoing flow of inspiration towards the perception of each one within aka the source of all KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" for each one within.
It's not just revisionism; stripping of natural connotations; suggested inversion of reality; rhetorical subversion and numerical encoding that corrupts all languages of this world...but all suggested words themselves represents the inversion of communication. Nature communicates through resonance (balance/choice); our parasites use suggestion to deceive us to communicate choice to choice; while ignoring balance. We seek agreement with each other; while ignoring that our choice represents the demanded response to balance for self sustenance of form within flow.
The repetitiveness represents the few mimicking the ongoing flow; by suggesting temptation (want over need) to the many repetitively. Nonstop suggestion of fiction to deceive the many to fall for the temptation to ignore reality. They racketeer ignorance through suggestion (-isms); which when consented to; causes division (conflict of reason aka want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; believing vs not believing etc.).
The few suggest by free will of choice; the many consent to suggestion by free will of choice aka the use of suggestion to cause submission of free will to free will of others.
Free will of choice represents ones sole authority over self within the balance of all; and so choosing to ignore it for the suggested choices by others, represents the shirking of responsibility over self onto the free will of others. This causes a chain of command with the few representing the sole authority over meaning for the consenting many who react upon it.
It is the resulting conflict of reason; between those who consent to believe the suggested meaning and those who consent to not believe it, that deceives the many from questioning the few as the source for the suggested meaning.
Half a century of reasoning about pro-life versus pro-choice is what sustains the suggested "abortion" racket; and the many are so ignorant that they lack to comprehend that "life equals choice". Pro-life versus pro-choice represents the two sides of the same conflict of reason; branded by the few to both mock the many for their ignorance, and as a sleight of hand to those with eyes to see.
Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything to communicate inspiration. Only free will of choice can suggested branded information to others; while ignoring that nature offers all inspiration at any moment (um) to every one within.
You can easily use Latin and Greek to reverse engineer all the revisionism done to shape Pig-Latin (aka English) into the suggested slave language for many; but without comprehension of natural law (defined by flow upon form) one lacks comprehension of communication (resonance).
Instead try to use need over want; inspiration over information, and implicaiton (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; believing vs not believing etc.)
Spell-craft aka shaping sound into words to suggest meaning towards choice; which when consented to allows the few to react in the name of (in nomine) the suggested words. Reality represents constant change; so deceive the many to consent to affixed labels, and racketeer the shit out of their self destructive ignorance; while suggesting the inversion of reality.
I found this a fascinating read. I agree with the majority of what was said, but at the same time I'm uncertain what you suggest here. I am not trying to change the way the world conceives of communication (totally), I think we first must resist and defeat this evil and then we can move to higher levels of understanding. If we do not defeat this evil first the world will not be able to follow into enlightenment and I'm not ready to give up on 7 billion souls
You agree by choice to suggestions by the choice of others. Meanwhile; choice represents the reaction to balance; hence without balance; no choice. Ignoring balance represents the choice of want over need; and others use suggestion to exploit this.
The uncertainty represent lack of comprehension; caused by ignorance (want over need) towards perceived (balance) in exchange for suggested (imbalance).
Movement represents the constant change for all within. It's what our choice (need/want) balances in. You don't need to change others; you need to shape self within change.
Choice agreeing vs disagreeing with suggested choices does not represent communication. It represents reasoning about a suggestion; caused by consent to the suggestion.
Life being moved from inception towards death represents being resistance within velocity for balance, and that's neither a conflict; nor can resistance (momentum) defeat velocity (motion).
We represent a reaction to balance; and our parasites exploit our ignorance thereof through suggestions; which causes reason (division aka conflict).
Before you resist the temptation to fall for the suggestions of others; you make a choice...need or want. That's the only choice ONE has within ALL and the parasites tricked us to with suggestions to choose between want vs not want (reason). There's no winning within want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Good vs evil (reasoning) is based on your choice upon suggestions by others. Where does nature offer good or evil states to your senses? What if pretending to be good/evil; while blaming the other side to be good/evil keeps both sides in ignorance of balance/choice? Why do you think the few play both persecuted victim and ultimate boogeyman for the many? They mimic balance to deceive the choice of reaction by the many.
Growth within movement requires resistance by adaptation to it aka choice responding to balance. For one to understand requires adaptation to perceived input; not to suggested explanations of perceived input by others. To explain movement; doesn't represent growing understanding thereof through choice based adaptation to balance within movement.
It's like: "I read a martial arts book...let's fight"
Being moved as life from inception towards death...towards what outcome are you following? Enlightenment implies supply with light; which represents flow to form, hence we represent the enlightened; which you can confirm by your perception and choice based reaction to light. We represent the ones growing through it, and guess what? We also perceive darkness; hence being within balance of natural opposites.
All numbers are suggested to the many to deceive them to ignore the only ONE that matters (form) within ALL (flow)...ONEself. They deceive us to seek to unite; yet we ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
Soul aka SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka adaptation as form to flow. You don't need to give up anything; you represents everything aka ONE within ALL and ALL(in)ONE of energy aka "alone"; which the parasites suggest means "single; solitary; separated; only".