If you don't support banning those books because of Critical Race Theory, then it seems to me that you agree with them on that issue.
If you want my opinion on CRT, I'm not very familiar with it. From what I have seen, it looks like it is being used as a political tool and could cause even more problems in race relations.
So here is the point I want to make: you can strongly disagree with a group on many things and still have things you agree upon.
"We cannot let anti-Critical Race Theory laws prevent educators from teaching about important topics like race & racism through the lens of children’s literature." Not everything these people say is on the surface (as above, so below). This is propaganda rage bait for the ones who buy into CRT (and those opposed). Ulterior motives are at play here. Parents want CRITICAL RACE THEORY (a whacked tool to contribute to the destruction of society) off the shelves...not books about racism. But you, a self proclaimed "truthbomber", still hasnt figured out how to see deception right in front of your face. Thats why you're way off base here. Your original comment was "they are correct"...that is the point you made. I cannot be duped by these clowns, therefore i do not agree.
I hope you don't think I was trying to conceal the fact that the ADL has written favorably about Critical Race Theory nor trying to mischaracterize what you said as being in agreement with CRT. I think it was pretty clear that you and the ADL sharply disagree on the subject: they want these laws written so they don't ban certain children's books while you would prefer that they not be drafted at all.
I give you my word that I will educate myself about the topic, but as it stands, I hate book banning more than I dislike CRT. To me it looks like CRT is just another way of dividing people so that every minority group gets to feel wronged enough to vote for their so-called champions.
At worst, CRT is dangerous enough to create another irreparably damaged generation. Check out the Blue Eye/Brown Eye exercise, subsequently renamed The Eye of the Storm and imitated in countless classrooms since. The eponymous film https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eye_of_the_Storm_(1970_film) documents the affect on third-graders of being in the out group for just one day.
If you don't support banning those books because of Critical Race Theory, then it seems to me that you agree with them on that issue.
If you want my opinion on CRT, I'm not very familiar with it. From what I have seen, it looks like it is being used as a political tool and could cause even more problems in race relations.
So here is the point I want to make: you can strongly disagree with a group on many things and still have things you agree upon.
"We cannot let anti-Critical Race Theory laws prevent educators from teaching about important topics like race & racism through the lens of children’s literature." Not everything these people say is on the surface (as above, so below). This is propaganda rage bait for the ones who buy into CRT (and those opposed). Ulterior motives are at play here. Parents want CRITICAL RACE THEORY (a whacked tool to contribute to the destruction of society) off the shelves...not books about racism. But you, a self proclaimed "truthbomber", still hasnt figured out how to see deception right in front of your face. Thats why you're way off base here. Your original comment was "they are correct"...that is the point you made. I cannot be duped by these clowns, therefore i do not agree.
I hope you don't think I was trying to conceal the fact that the ADL has written favorably about Critical Race Theory nor trying to mischaracterize what you said as being in agreement with CRT. I think it was pretty clear that you and the ADL sharply disagree on the subject: they want these laws written so they don't ban certain children's books while you would prefer that they not be drafted at all.
I give you my word that I will educate myself about the topic, but as it stands, I hate book banning more than I dislike CRT. To me it looks like CRT is just another way of dividing people so that every minority group gets to feel wronged enough to vote for their so-called champions.
At worst, CRT is dangerous enough to create another irreparably damaged generation. Check out the Blue Eye/Brown Eye exercise, subsequently renamed The Eye of the Storm and imitated in countless classrooms since. The eponymous film https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eye_of_the_Storm_(1970_film) documents the affect on third-graders of being in the out group for just one day.