Is progress improving our happiness? No. So why continue?
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...temporary growth within ongoing loss. Life is not outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life is balance oriented; hence free will of choice representing the response to balance...not to the suggested choices of others; which represents the temptation to ignore balance/choice aka self sustenance of form within flow.
The middle ages was basically...
...a suggestion by the few about what allegedly was; which deceives the many to ignore the only thing that is...the ever changing moment (um) of motion aka the balance our choice reacts to.
Time represents the measurement of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...); while suggested past; present and future represent the ignorance of the ever changing moment(um) that represents the placement of choice within balance aka form within flow aka temporary within ongoing aka potential within potentiality aka growth within loss aka magnetic within electric aka ONE within ALL.
Suggesting mankind rules of behavior is called civilization; suggesting other life-forms rules of behavior is called domestication.
What is going on here?
The laws of men are suggested towards choice; the laws of nature demand reaction by choice. Consent to the former represents ignorance towards the latter.
Most people seem to believe
Nature demands constant adaption; consenting to believe the suggestions by others represents stagnation in ignorance of adaptation. All -isms are suggested by the few to divide (reason) and domesticate the free will of the many.
the theme behind the notion of evolution of civilization and technology.
Movement. We represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary resistance (form) to ongoing velocity (flow). Choosing to ignore this corrupts our understanding of it; and the parasitic few use suggestion to deceive the many to consent to ignorance.
What if the technology that first brings...then turns into...
Movement causes corruption upon the temporary form within; especially if the form chooses to ignore choice based reaction to balance within flow (aka adaptation for self sustenance). The parasitic few racketeer the self destructive ignorance of the many towards self sustenance by suggesting them to hold onto other form (technology; entertainment; history; religion etc.) while flow dissolves it.
the mainstream sources
Flow represents the main stream source of ALL information for each ONE within; and it communicates itself to the perceiving senses of those within as inspiration for free will of choice to react to. Nature does not offer branded information (true or false); it offers inspiration (constant change).
A sad shell of what it was
Building a sandcastle on the beach aka temporary form within ongoing flow; tempts you to try to hold onto it; while the water retakes it. This is what the parasitic few exploiting upon the ignorant many...all form represents the temporary sandcastle within the ongoing movement.
We need to shape form within flow for balance (self sustenance by choice based reaction to movement)...not for the temporary form that we shape. The parasites suggest us to seek progress; to want outcomes and achievements aka want (ignorance) over need (self sustenance). Our "free" will of choice represents the reaction to the "dom"-inance of balance. Choice needs to respond to balance within flow...yet is tempted to want to consent to the suggested choices of other form.
Look at science
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information by others under the umbrella of scientism.
rethink the history
Suggested his-story always leaves out the (re)actor within ALL existence...ONEself.The few suggest his-story to deceive each one of the many to ignore expressing his own by choice of reaction. You don't rethink history; you're stuck in a suggested hamster-wheel of stories about others; while trying to make sense out of endless suggested contradictions.
Is there a way to keep technology out of the hands of the destructors
TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] - ""systematic treatment of an art, craft, or technique". Ones choice represents a reaction to the system of balance; and one mistreats oneself when choosing to ignore balance for suggested choices by others.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...temporary growth within ongoing loss. Life is not outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life is balance oriented; hence free will of choice representing the response to balance...not to the suggested choices of others; which represents the temptation to ignore balance/choice aka self sustenance of form within flow.
...a suggestion by the few about what allegedly was; which deceives the many to ignore the only thing that is...the ever changing moment (um) of motion aka the balance our choice reacts to.
Time represents the measurement of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...); while suggested past; present and future represent the ignorance of the ever changing moment(um) that represents the placement of choice within balance aka form within flow aka temporary within ongoing aka potential within potentiality aka growth within loss aka magnetic within electric aka ONE within ALL.
Have you ever watched Battlestar Galactica? “It has happened before... it’ll happen again...”
If you haven’t watched it, do it. All the way to the end. You will be satisfied.
I have similar thoughts, I think technology can be harnessed in better way but are most certainly not doing that.
You probably know these books but just in case, The Eternal Adam by Verne
Jacques Ellul technological society
Ted Kaczynski Manifesto
Suggesting mankind rules of behavior is called civilization; suggesting other life-forms rules of behavior is called domestication.
The laws of men are suggested towards choice; the laws of nature demand reaction by choice. Consent to the former represents ignorance towards the latter.
Nature demands constant adaption; consenting to believe the suggestions by others represents stagnation in ignorance of adaptation. All -isms are suggested by the few to divide (reason) and domesticate the free will of the many.
Movement. We represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary resistance (form) to ongoing velocity (flow). Choosing to ignore this corrupts our understanding of it; and the parasitic few use suggestion to deceive the many to consent to ignorance.
Movement causes corruption upon the temporary form within; especially if the form chooses to ignore choice based reaction to balance within flow (aka adaptation for self sustenance). The parasitic few racketeer the self destructive ignorance of the many towards self sustenance by suggesting them to hold onto other form (technology; entertainment; history; religion etc.) while flow dissolves it.
Flow represents the main stream source of ALL information for each ONE within; and it communicates itself to the perceiving senses of those within as inspiration for free will of choice to react to. Nature does not offer branded information (true or false); it offers inspiration (constant change).
Building a sandcastle on the beach aka temporary form within ongoing flow; tempts you to try to hold onto it; while the water retakes it. This is what the parasitic few exploiting upon the ignorant many...all form represents the temporary sandcastle within the ongoing movement.
We need to shape form within flow for balance (self sustenance by choice based reaction to movement)...not for the temporary form that we shape. The parasites suggest us to seek progress; to want outcomes and achievements aka want (ignorance) over need (self sustenance). Our "free" will of choice represents the reaction to the "dom"-inance of balance. Choice needs to respond to balance within flow...yet is tempted to want to consent to the suggested choices of other form.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information by others under the umbrella of scientism.
Suggested his-story always leaves out the (re)actor within ALL existence...ONEself.The few suggest his-story to deceive each one of the many to ignore expressing his own by choice of reaction. You don't rethink history; you're stuck in a suggested hamster-wheel of stories about others; while trying to make sense out of endless suggested contradictions.
TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] - ""systematic treatment of an art, craft, or technique". Ones choice represents a reaction to the system of balance; and one mistreats oneself when choosing to ignore balance for suggested choices by others.