No, it was never isolated in scientific sense, as real scientists do isolation of object of study. It was only "isolated" in newspeak medical hoaxers terms, that does not mean isolation at all.
Every scientist who want to study something do all the best to separate object of study from everything else, to enshure that he study properties only of that object, and not the contaminants. Every single scientist do that, from chemists that spend a lot of time to get substance as pure as possible before study to physicist who sometines spent billions and years to get object of interest as clean as possible. And only after that sometimes complex and expensive process of real isolation, scientist could make any conclusions on properties of his object of study. If object was not isolates, scientists honestly state that its properties is unknowh, like, f.e. in the case of superheavy elements that created in amount of few atoms.
Every real scientist do that. Except that modern SARS-CoV-2 "virologists", who just get the soup from dead monkey kidneys, antibiotics, antifungicides, different stabilisers and God knows what else, suppose that cells is dead because of virus and use PCR that absolutely not suitable for testing to show that virus presents in that soup. That is not an isolation in any meaning. It is a shame for science and offence of logic and common sense. And of course that "isolation" in no case could give a single sample of virus suitable for any study. The result of such "isolation" even could not be used as a proof of virus existence, not even talking about RNA sequencing or proving its pathogenicity. So, all tha bullshit about "SARS-CoV-2 was isolated" is nothing more than bullshit.
SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated. Dot.
And all that along that even 50 years ago there was no problems to get an industrial amounts of isolated flu virus (for making flu vaccines, which appeared to be ineffective and useless for quickly mutating virus to degree that USSR dropped mass flu vaccinations) with purity of 95%, i.e. suspension of virus particles that consists from 95% of virus with only 5% of impurities. I post a link to one of that 50-years old articles that describe real virus isolation again for you - https://sci-hub.tf/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90103-4
If you want to push that hoax about "isolation" of SARS-CoV-2, you choose wrong forum. If you want to prove that SARS-CoV-2 was isolated show any paper where real scientists finally got a pure SARS-CoV-2 particles without any contaminants with more than 90% purity. And don't bring again that fraudulent papers here, where "scientists" only got a soup from dead monkey cells and other shit and use completely unsuitable PCR "test" to "prove" that there is a virus somwhere in that soup of shit.
No, you don't. You have only shameful anti-scientific papers describing dancing around soup from dead monkey kidney cells with uncounted contaminants without any sign of control experiments and real isolation.
I won't engage in this anymore.
Of course. Because you can't.
I personally know a person who isolates and full-genome sequences viruses in a BSL lab without PCR, NAAT or RT.
Can we see the results of that isolation? Is it a pure suspension of virus particles where we will find only that identical particles and nothing else?
Or it is just yet another dancing around some shitty soup where presumably could be some virus and "sequencing" genome by randomly combining random pieces of nucleotide sequences from that soup into some "full-genome" sequence?
What do you have?
I have real scientific papers and 50 years of real virus and virus-like particles isolation with final purity of isolate up to 99%.
Simplest thing that all your so-called "scientists" suddenly can't do for nearly 2 years with that misterious SARS-CoV-2.
So it never was isolated, and that is why there can't be any scientific proofs of it existence and that it cause COVID-19 disease.
Video claims from crackpots who don't even understand NG sequencing.
I never post any link to any video about virus isolation. Ever. You are just a liar. Again.
No, it was never isolated in scientific sense, as real scientists do isolation of object of study. It was only "isolated" in newspeak medical hoaxers terms, that does not mean isolation at all.
Every scientist who want to study something do all the best to separate object of study from everything else, to enshure that he study properties only of that object, and not the contaminants. Every single scientist do that, from chemists that spend a lot of time to get substance as pure as possible before study to physicist who sometines spent billions and years to get object of interest as clean as possible. And only after that sometimes complex and expensive process of real isolation, scientist could make any conclusions on properties of his object of study. If object was not isolates, scientists honestly state that its properties is unknowh, like, f.e. in the case of superheavy elements that created in amount of few atoms.
Every real scientist do that. Except that modern SARS-CoV-2 "virologists", who just get the soup from dead monkey kidneys, antibiotics, antifungicides, different stabilisers and God knows what else, suppose that cells is dead because of virus and use PCR that absolutely not suitable for testing to show that virus presents in that soup. That is not an isolation in any meaning. It is a shame for science and offence of logic and common sense. And of course that "isolation" in no case could give a single sample of virus suitable for any study. The result of such "isolation" even could not be used as a proof of virus existence, not even talking about RNA sequencing or proving its pathogenicity. So, all tha bullshit about "SARS-CoV-2 was isolated" is nothing more than bullshit.
SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated. Dot.
And all that along that even 50 years ago there was no problems to get an industrial amounts of isolated flu virus (for making flu vaccines, which appeared to be ineffective and useless for quickly mutating virus to degree that USSR dropped mass flu vaccinations) with purity of 95%, i.e. suspension of virus particles that consists from 95% of virus with only 5% of impurities. I post a link to one of that 50-years old articles that describe real virus isolation again for you - https://sci-hub.tf/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90103-4
If you want to push that hoax about "isolation" of SARS-CoV-2, you choose wrong forum. If you want to prove that SARS-CoV-2 was isolated show any paper where real scientists finally got a pure SARS-CoV-2 particles without any contaminants with more than 90% purity. And don't bring again that fraudulent papers here, where "scientists" only got a soup from dead monkey cells and other shit and use completely unsuitable PCR "test" to "prove" that there is a virus somwhere in that soup of shit.
You already tried to push that nonsense about SARS-CoV-2 isolation here and failed. Why do you still trying to do it again?
No, you don't. You have only shameful anti-scientific papers describing dancing around soup from dead monkey kidney cells with uncounted contaminants without any sign of control experiments and real isolation.
Of course. Because you can't.
Can we see the results of that isolation? Is it a pure suspension of virus particles where we will find only that identical particles and nothing else?
Or it is just yet another dancing around some shitty soup where presumably could be some virus and "sequencing" genome by randomly combining random pieces of nucleotide sequences from that soup into some "full-genome" sequence?
I have real scientific papers and 50 years of real virus and virus-like particles isolation with final purity of isolate up to 99%.
Simplest thing that all your so-called "scientists" suddenly can't do for nearly 2 years with that misterious SARS-CoV-2. So it never was isolated, and that is why there can't be any scientific proofs of it existence and that it cause COVID-19 disease.
I never post any link to any video about virus isolation. Ever. You are just a liar. Again.