Know Thy Talmud #1 (The Talmud Conspiracy)
Know Thy Talmud #3 (What You Need to Know)
If the Talmud is quite evil, surly it must be easy to just link to an online version and cite it talking about how to kill all non-jews, steal from them or enslave them? Actually no, if it was that easy, then everyone on the planet would have already known about the Jewish Talmudic problem, you just can't expect an online Talmud version put up by an ex-google engineer to really put it out on the open now would you?
You can't easily cite the evils in the Talmud for the following reasons:
1-The Talmud is massive, in some prints, well over 20 volumes! And that's just the Babylonian Talmud, there is the Palestinian Talmud (Considered less credible), and there is the mystic version, the Zohar, and there are many, many more books and commentaries or abridged versions. In addition the Talmud (Babylonian), its laws (Mishna) are written in special Hebrew, you can't just study ordinary Hebrew to understand it correctly, the commentary and explanatory parts (Gemara) are written in Aramaic (anyone remember when Israeli ISIS tried to destroy the only city in existence which speaks it (Maaloula, Syria)), The Palestinian Talmud Gemara is written in different form of Aramaic (Western). And I can go on and on, basically it's quite difficult to wade through the Talmud for its size and ancient language, Christian Europe only discovered its evil around the 13th century!! And it happened through the few jewish converts such as (Nicolas Donin, Pablo Christiani, Johannes Pfefferkorn)
Additionally, there has been many disputations, such as the Lwów disputation in September 1759 involving Jacob Frank.
2-Because the Talmud was discovered to be evil on various occasions which led to pogroms and its burnings (France 1242, in addition to Rome and Barcelona); "Clean" or "Expurgated" versions of the Talmud were eventually used while the "original" versions hidden in synagogues. One of the first expurgated versions was one printed in Basil 1578-1581. The versions which contain all the clear references are the Venice version printed in 1520-1523 by Daniel Bomberg, and the Amsterdam version printed in 1644-1648. If you want a hint to know that you are on to something, try buying one of those version or any old Talmud versions for that matter!!!
In short: Due to government and self censorship, all "modern" Talmud versions do not have the exact clear terms, instead they are deleted or renamed with words the Rabbis understand, (Jesus sometimes renamed into "the one whose memory shall be erased" etc..)
If this is the case, then how do we know about its evils? There are still references of those who examined those issues such as: Talmud Unmasked
Additionally there are many books on the subject, unfortunately these books are disappearing by the day! Please do save the info I have written and the PDFs I linked such as the Talmud Unmasked.
BTW sorry just a quick addition for you if you ever waste time on the Talmud, again please note that because it is MASSIVE, many contradictory things can be gleaned from it. Someone can make it as a book good for the "goy", others as bad for the "goy", in the Gemara there are many explanations, you can pick whatever you want.
But.... it seems the orthodox rabbis, or jews in control, so called "elite" always pick the worst.
for example occupying Palestine is strictly not allowed in the Talmud and the Torah, it can only happen after the messiah have already come. You are not supposed to hasten his coming, yet due to the influence of Zionism they found some texts which allows it and order it!!! Neturei Karta are actual more accurate and correct about that point
So I tell people the Talmud should be understood as a giant wiki with frontpages and backpages. It has everyone's opinion, and all it goes to show is what opinions existed. In many cases the majority opinion can be found by following the flow, and in some of these cases the majority is regarded as binding on Orthodox Jewish practice, but these are a very small percentage (1%-5%) of the opinions in the Talmud.
Your assertion that the Orthodox pick the worst reading does not seem to be instantiable. I don't believe the Talmud forbids occupation of Palestine prior to Messiah; rather, Ezekiel 36-37 indicates that return to Palestine will happen before Israel understands the Messiah's purpose, and no Talmudic passage will contradict that. The idea you quote is that, since everything is foreknown deterministically by God, it's impossible to "hasten" or "slow" the coming of Messiah by action, but since free will exists it's appropriate to do what is right that will in time bring the coming of Messiah. So if the Talmud speaks of occupying the land of Biblical Israel, it only builds on the Old (and New) Testament prophecies about this.