I’ve been trying to think of a way to study these. I think we need to characterize their dispersal and time the effects alongside atmospheric conditions. I’ve seen both. I know central’s are real. Bill gate talks about using them for climate.
I've thought about this, it would be a lot of work but definitely doable.
You have cameras set up in different places at fixed locations, looking upward. Each plane crossing the field of view is analyzed for the opacity and size of the trail over time. Sightings are correlated with flight databases to get the plane type which yhou can then use the apparent optical size to get its altitude reasonably accurately. Then you take tons of data.
Once you have tons of data in different locations you look at the distributions of size, opacity, length of time (perhaps use a combined metric) with different altitudes and atmospheric conditions. If the chemtrail hypothesis is correct, you'd expect to see a separate population of data points from the normal contrails (ie longer coverage times for the same altitude / humidity conditions)
Interesting fact - in US they try to create clouds with chemtrails. In Russia it is opposite - they disperse clouds using chemtrails. Bill Gates should be mad. :)
In Russia cloud dispersing chemtrails is a legal business, there even a taxation code (71.12.57 - Activity connected with active impact on meteorological and geophysical processes).
Our chemtrails clearly visible on satellite images (NOAA-19, NOAA-15, NOAA-18 Meteor-M 2 received on RTL-SDR dongle on satellite passes) as a regular patterns of parallel lines or rectangular mesh. I think it is not hard to receive and analyse images from sateliite passes over USA and look for chemtrails.
Interesting to note about differences by country. I’ve lived in different areas of US and can confirm there appears to be a connection between the frequency of these and the population density of the area.
Re: SDR- This is a great idea. I think NOAA satellites will report atmospheric conditions. They’re encoded but not encrypted.
I think NOAA satellites will report atmospheric conditions. They’re encoded but not encrypted.
From NOAA you could easily get grayscale images of sky above you from the altilude of 800km in visible and infrared. There are a lot of ready-to-use mostly opensource programs to get and save them. Just search "RTL-SDR satellite images receiving", you will get a tons of info.
NOAA images even not encoded, they are plain analog raster.
It is Meteor-M 2 LRPT channels encoded as grayscale jpeg, but from Meteor you will get 3 channels and you can combine them into color image.
Low resolution images are 1px/km. Satellites also transmit high resolution images with 4px/km, but it is slightly harder to get them - you need to add at least 1.7GHz downconverter with LNA to your "ground station" setup.
I’ve been trying to think of a way to study these. I think we need to characterize their dispersal and time the effects alongside atmospheric conditions. I’ve seen both. I know central’s are real. Bill gate talks about using them for climate.
I've thought about this, it would be a lot of work but definitely doable.
You have cameras set up in different places at fixed locations, looking upward. Each plane crossing the field of view is analyzed for the opacity and size of the trail over time. Sightings are correlated with flight databases to get the plane type which yhou can then use the apparent optical size to get its altitude reasonably accurately. Then you take tons of data.
Once you have tons of data in different locations you look at the distributions of size, opacity, length of time (perhaps use a combined metric) with different altitudes and atmospheric conditions. If the chemtrail hypothesis is correct, you'd expect to see a separate population of data points from the normal contrails (ie longer coverage times for the same altitude / humidity conditions)
This is the way. Build an sdk and a kit and recruit.
Interesting fact - in US they try to create clouds with chemtrails. In Russia it is opposite - they disperse clouds using chemtrails. Bill Gates should be mad. :)
In Russia cloud dispersing chemtrails is a legal business, there even a taxation code (71.12.57 - Activity connected with active impact on meteorological and geophysical processes).
Our chemtrails clearly visible on satellite images (NOAA-19, NOAA-15, NOAA-18 Meteor-M 2 received on RTL-SDR dongle on satellite passes) as a regular patterns of parallel lines or rectangular mesh. I think it is not hard to receive and analyse images from sateliite passes over USA and look for chemtrails.
Interesting to note about differences by country. I’ve lived in different areas of US and can confirm there appears to be a connection between the frequency of these and the population density of the area.
Re: SDR- This is a great idea. I think NOAA satellites will report atmospheric conditions. They’re encoded but not encrypted.
From NOAA you could easily get grayscale images of sky above you from the altilude of 800km in visible and infrared. There are a lot of ready-to-use mostly opensource programs to get and save them. Just search "RTL-SDR satellite images receiving", you will get a tons of info.
NOAA images even not encoded, they are plain analog raster.
It is Meteor-M 2 LRPT channels encoded as grayscale jpeg, but from Meteor you will get 3 channels and you can combine them into color image.
Low resolution images are 1px/km. Satellites also transmit high resolution images with 4px/km, but it is slightly harder to get them - you need to add at least 1.7GHz downconverter with LNA to your "ground station" setup.
My antenna is really poor quality. May need to get a better setup. Maybe a dish.
Look up Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. They are very real. Former CIA director John Brennon spoke about using them