The chief problem which arises when we apply our theories to any particular situation in the real world. A theory of essentially complex phenomena must refer to a large number of particular facts; and to derive a prediction from it, or to test it, we have to ascertain all these particular facts. Once we succeeded in this there should be no particular difficulty about deriving testable predictions. But there are way to many unknowable facts, and further the real danger consists in the ascertainment of the particular facts after the events have happened to comport to our theories beforehand.
Example: "OF COURSE Biden's vax mandate was all a ploy, never meant to be implemented."
You don't know that, what you're doing is taking information after events have happened and reinterpreting them to comport to your theories afterwards. You backwash your reasoning to fit current events. This way lies charlatanism and worse. Make your testable theories up PRIOR to events, or, at the very least, stick to analyzing events as they happen or after they have happened to try to ascertain what is the most objective truth.
Here’s a prediction: every forum eventually turns into the low effort meme shitposts
With enough repetition, a verified hypothesis becomes an agreed upon law. Let's see what happens. It happens elsewhere.
Therefore, let's call this the "KiloRomeo's Theory of Memes".
Lol okay. To be fair i want high effort predictive activities to occur but acknowledge that this will have to happen as an emergent consensus across meme shitposts
The best memes use a mostly visual encapsulation of complex idea, usually with few words, often to portray incongruous ideas/reality. That's why leftists can't meme, they don't care about intellectual consistency.
They are entertaining, and memes will have to occur with the predictive activities because, well, we can't be serious all the time.
What if it’s also a means of sense making. Leftists can’t meme because they’re using the dialectic not the dichotomous as a way of lensing.