I'm in the camp of "does it matter?". Meaning, we live in the jungle still. And we still have law of the jungle - irregardless of what we think we have or don't have. The ones with the biggest guns are boss - literally and figuratively. Some places it's this or that entity, some places it's the people.

So in some respect it doesn't matter what piece of paper you or they hold - it only works within the framework of an existing paradigm. If they say, "but we own you, it says right here on this piece of paper", you say "fuck you".

It really doesn't matter.

Central banks literally create money from nothing, why would they need some elaborate CAPITAL NAME, birth certificate tradeable commodity scheme?

If there is truth to it, do you really think they'd respect the rights of someone without a birth certificate?

Arguing this plays into their court.

But as an intellectual exercise. Mason jordan maxwell is the point man on this.

Consent to suggested monetary value represents ignorance towards free will of choice representing the highest value in existence...evaluation.

Consent towards suggested meaning represents ignorance towards being within a system that doesn't suggest meaning; which instead moves all within to communicate inspiration towards choice of reaction.

Both the suggested currency within the resulting bank & trust as well as the maritime admiralty law system underneath the common law system represent layers of deception upon human comprehension of natural law.

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each of us represents a choice based reaction to balance aka a resistance (form) within velocity (flow) aka growth potential (form) within the loss of potentiality (flow). Choice reacts to balance; other choices makes suggestion to tempt choice to ignore balance.

Free will of choice is between need (respond to balance) or want (fall for the temptation of suggested choice aka ignorance of balance).

You’re a tradeable asset to the banksters.