By what means? Only way to really verify some historic document is to get a time machine and observe its creation. Even then, it could turn out to be a curved mirror of reality. Do you have a time machine?
must be rewritten conspiracies.
Russian history is permanently rewriting. Even right now. F.e., do you know that now, it was not a Russian people who defeat Germany in WWII. It was a "multinational antifascist army". And they fight not for their homes against occupants, but "against fascism". Right about time. Nearly everybody who could disprove that dumb bullshit is already dead. If even that basic fact of Russian history changed now to fit the narrative, what make you think that other facts is untouched?
And there was a lot of actual conspiracies in Russian history and still is.
Again, you are entirely missing the point. Is it possible the facts I cited are erroneous, and subject to having been rewritten? Sure. Absolutely.
But you don’t get to just blindly SAY they are wrong because they don’t agree with your assertions. The ‘ everything that disagrees with me is a conspiracy‘ argument is just lazy.
Reputable by whom?
released by whom?
How do you know they are actual?
By what means? Only way to really verify some historic document is to get a time machine and observe its creation. Even then, it could turn out to be a curved mirror of reality. Do you have a time machine?
Russian history is permanently rewriting. Even right now. F.e., do you know that now, it was not a Russian people who defeat Germany in WWII. It was a "multinational antifascist army". And they fight not for their homes against occupants, but "against fascism". Right about time. Nearly everybody who could disprove that dumb bullshit is already dead. If even that basic fact of Russian history changed now to fit the narrative, what make you think that other facts is untouched?
And there was a lot of actual conspiracies in Russian history and still is.
Again, you are entirely missing the point. Is it possible the facts I cited are erroneous, and subject to having been rewritten? Sure. Absolutely.
But you don’t get to just blindly SAY they are wrong because they don’t agree with your assertions. The ‘ everything that disagrees with me is a conspiracy‘ argument is just lazy.