Shortly - during revolution, normal food chains was broken and cities fall to starvation. Red Army too. That could lead to counter-revolution. Jews who lead revolution (Trotsky, Tuchachevsky and others) jusr rob farmers completely, leaving farmers with no seed to sow or cattle to breed. Jews do not care about goym, you know. So, on the next year, there was nothing to eat. A lot of people die. To "fix" that, collective farms was organized, again with farmers robbery, with same result - starvation. Authorities created laws with death sentence even for "three spikes of wheat" to get as many food for cities and army as possible. That does not works too. Eventually Stalin who finally got the full power shoot the jewish top commanders and ministers who did all that madness, relax anti-farmers laws and things returned to normal in late 1930-s. Food shortages was defeated and people stop to starve.
Really it is not clear if it was intentional attempt of goyim genocide or they just was so dumb to understand what will be the result of total farmers robbery, but in any case, actions of Jewish revolution leaders definitely killed millions of Russians, Belorussians and Ukrainians.
There are no theories that above did not happened. Also, I didn;t meet any theories that it was not Jews. Question is only in numbers of dead. Say, was it 100 millions or 10 millions. Also some believe that Stalin participated in it from the beginning, but then quit and turned against his jewish comrades, and some believe that Stalin was against from the beginning, but had no power to oppose.
There definitely was warehouses full of food for authorities, but was it for all state bureaucrats or just for the top ones, I don't know.
Red Army had supply better than cities, but that was not complete too. However, even that small difference was used to attract more people to the military service.
you seem knowledgeable on the subject, what was the deal with Stalin anyway? was he as evil as history would have us believe. im only asking because I find myself questioning alot of what we've been taught over the years
Stalin was totalitarian leader, whose main goal was building a powerful empire. He does not take into account human lives and tried to get his goal at any cost. However, since his goal was not a personal wealth, sometimes his actions made life of people better. Do you know, f.e. that during Stalin years smoothbore guns sold at homedepots along with spades and hammers without any papers? And immidiately after his death Russians was robbed of the right to have a gun. It's very strange along with his cruelty and totalitarian nature. All in all, eventually he build his empire, and Russia become first world country (at the time) with aerospace, nuclear bomb, advanced science, total education and relatevely healthy population under his control, despite all wars, misfortune and disasters. That cost a lot of lifes, but not all of them are on him. He definitely was not the best possible ruler, but I think he was not the worse. Hard to tell, but I think that if, f.e. Trotsky took over in 1930-s, things could be much worse for country and people.
I can't tell who Stalin really was, but he definitely was the real and independent historic figure, unlike modern politicians.
In Russia, some people worship him, some hate him, there is no any definite attitude.
Depends on what you think Holodomor was.
Shortly - during revolution, normal food chains was broken and cities fall to starvation. Red Army too. That could lead to counter-revolution. Jews who lead revolution (Trotsky, Tuchachevsky and others) jusr rob farmers completely, leaving farmers with no seed to sow or cattle to breed. Jews do not care about goym, you know. So, on the next year, there was nothing to eat. A lot of people die. To "fix" that, collective farms was organized, again with farmers robbery, with same result - starvation. Authorities created laws with death sentence even for "three spikes of wheat" to get as many food for cities and army as possible. That does not works too. Eventually Stalin who finally got the full power shoot the jewish top commanders and ministers who did all that madness, relax anti-farmers laws and things returned to normal in late 1930-s. Food shortages was defeated and people stop to starve.
Really it is not clear if it was intentional attempt of goyim genocide or they just was so dumb to understand what will be the result of total farmers robbery, but in any case, actions of Jewish revolution leaders definitely killed millions of Russians, Belorussians and Ukrainians.
There are no theories that above did not happened. Also, I didn;t meet any theories that it was not Jews. Question is only in numbers of dead. Say, was it 100 millions or 10 millions. Also some believe that Stalin participated in it from the beginning, but then quit and turned against his jewish comrades, and some believe that Stalin was against from the beginning, but had no power to oppose.
Something like that...
There definitely was warehouses full of food for authorities, but was it for all state bureaucrats or just for the top ones, I don't know.
Red Army had supply better than cities, but that was not complete too. However, even that small difference was used to attract more people to the military service.
you seem knowledgeable on the subject, what was the deal with Stalin anyway? was he as evil as history would have us believe. im only asking because I find myself questioning alot of what we've been taught over the years
Stalin was totalitarian leader, whose main goal was building a powerful empire. He does not take into account human lives and tried to get his goal at any cost. However, since his goal was not a personal wealth, sometimes his actions made life of people better. Do you know, f.e. that during Stalin years smoothbore guns sold at homedepots along with spades and hammers without any papers? And immidiately after his death Russians was robbed of the right to have a gun. It's very strange along with his cruelty and totalitarian nature. All in all, eventually he build his empire, and Russia become first world country (at the time) with aerospace, nuclear bomb, advanced science, total education and relatevely healthy population under his control, despite all wars, misfortune and disasters. That cost a lot of lifes, but not all of them are on him. He definitely was not the best possible ruler, but I think he was not the worse. Hard to tell, but I think that if, f.e. Trotsky took over in 1930-s, things could be much worse for country and people.
I can't tell who Stalin really was, but he definitely was the real and independent historic figure, unlike modern politicians.
In Russia, some people worship him, some hate him, there is no any definite attitude.