I've had inside information for decades that the buildings were brought down by "dial a nuke"s placed in the subbasements. These are military weapons designed to be able to leave little radioactivity afterwards. Info was via a leaked security clearanced source inside the New York Port Authority.
The nukes blew straight up elevator shafts and also - important - inadvertently blew pressure through the sewer system under these and neighboring buildings. That was detected but not talked about.
Another thing is the nukes emitted radiation some of which left the buildings and radiated out. Much of it was absorbed by nearby buildings but some went through gaps between buildings and was absorbed by the metal in parked cars blocks away. There the heated metal burned its paint off and yet nearby newspapers which were nonmetallic and so did not absorb the energy, did not burn. Absolute proof radiation was emitted, as this was not thermal energy from any collapse, and no way that could have happened by any other mechanism.
Also tritium levels in air were elevated, and the steel that Bush immediately sent to China (to be melted and of course destroyed as evidence) was also radioactive.
I came into this when I worked on a project to furnish screening of trucks entering the new replacement towers. There is an underground facility for supply trucks that enter under the buildings. All vehicles coming in get scanned for radiation; this is to prevent nukes from being used in the future again. But locking the barn door after horses get out.
As for disparaging remarks related to credibility, I was part of a team that worked with the Port Authority to protect the new towers. To do that, we were opened to their information sources. I relate what I know, and there is some nasty stuff I may not disclose, but what I say is true, not made up or grandstanding.
The buildings start their collapse at the EXACT spots that the planes hit. How do you explain that with basement nukes?
The whole top collapsed above the impact area before anything below the impact area even moves.
There was plenty fucked up on 9-11, but no one can ever explain me that fact other than some magical technology, or they rigged the entire building and only set off those bombs (incredibly stupid to think any wiring for bombs or even radio tranceivers would work after sitting in fires for hours.).
I think the fire crews that went in did so to manually set the demolitions in motion. It was a secret safety protocol to prevent a domino effect in Manhattan.
But the demolitions would have had to be at the point of impact. There is no one on the planet that will convince me that whatever setup was there survived the planes and hours of fires.
Do you know the melting point of small wires and circuitry that's required for explosives?
No one would be able to go in and wire it for demolition at that point.
I've had inside information for decades that the buildings were brought down by "dial a nuke"s placed in the subbasements. These are military weapons designed to be able to leave little radioactivity afterwards. Info was via a leaked security clearanced source inside the New York Port Authority.
The nukes blew straight up elevator shafts and also - important - inadvertently blew pressure through the sewer system under these and neighboring buildings. That was detected but not talked about.
Another thing is the nukes emitted radiation some of which left the buildings and radiated out. Much of it was absorbed by nearby buildings but some went through gaps between buildings and was absorbed by the metal in parked cars blocks away. There the heated metal burned its paint off and yet nearby newspapers which were nonmetallic and so did not absorb the energy, did not burn. Absolute proof radiation was emitted, as this was not thermal energy from any collapse, and no way that could have happened by any other mechanism.
Also tritium levels in air were elevated, and the steel that Bush immediately sent to China (to be melted and of course destroyed as evidence) was also radioactive.
I came into this when I worked on a project to furnish screening of trucks entering the new replacement towers. There is an underground facility for supply trucks that enter under the buildings. All vehicles coming in get scanned for radiation; this is to prevent nukes from being used in the future again. But locking the barn door after horses get out.
As for disparaging remarks related to credibility, I was part of a team that worked with the Port Authority to protect the new towers. To do that, we were opened to their information sources. I relate what I know, and there is some nasty stuff I may not disclose, but what I say is true, not made up or grandstanding.
The buildings start their collapse at the EXACT spots that the planes hit. How do you explain that with basement nukes?
The whole top collapsed above the impact area before anything below the impact area even moves.
There was plenty fucked up on 9-11, but no one can ever explain me that fact other than some magical technology, or they rigged the entire building and only set off those bombs (incredibly stupid to think any wiring for bombs or even radio tranceivers would work after sitting in fires for hours.).
I think the fire crews that went in did so to manually set the demolitions in motion. It was a secret safety protocol to prevent a domino effect in Manhattan.
But the demolitions would have had to be at the point of impact. There is no one on the planet that will convince me that whatever setup was there survived the planes and hours of fires.
Do you know the melting point of small wires and circuitry that's required for explosives?
No one would be able to go in and wire it for demolition at that point.
You are assuming a few things.
I do not agree that the point of impact from the airplanes is necessarily a factor in the takedown. In fact, I think it is unlikely.
I do not believe that explosives were necessarily used, although I do think it is probable.
I do not believe a controlled demolition requires fragile components.
I do not believe that the takedown needed to occur in an exact spot that was ravaged by fire.
It is unclear to me how much time it would take to execute an emergency demolition if the protocol were pre-planned and practiced.