Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

45
The debate is over: The Twin Towers were mostly turned into dust in midair - steel and all! (www.youtube.com)
posted 4 years ago by PuzzleheadedWhile9 4 years ago by PuzzleheadedWhile9 +48 / -3
47 comments share
47 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
▲ -1 ▼
– RichardNIxon2point0 -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

The buildings start their collapse at the EXACT spots that the planes hit. How do you explain that with basement nukes?

The whole top collapsed above the impact area before anything below the impact area even moves.

There was plenty fucked up on 9-11, but no one can ever explain me that fact other than some magical technology, or they rigged the entire building and only set off those bombs (incredibly stupid to think any wiring for bombs or even radio tranceivers would work after sitting in fires for hours.).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I think the fire crews that went in did so to manually set the demolitions in motion. It was a secret safety protocol to prevent a domino effect in Manhattan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– RichardNIxon2point0 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

But the demolitions would have had to be at the point of impact. There is no one on the planet that will convince me that whatever setup was there survived the planes and hours of fires.

Do you know the melting point of small wires and circuitry that's required for explosives?

No one would be able to go in and wire it for demolition at that point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You are assuming a few things.

I do not agree that the point of impact from the airplanes is necessarily a factor in the takedown. In fact, I think it is unlikely.

I do not believe that explosives were necessarily used, although I do think it is probable.

I do not believe a controlled demolition requires fragile components.

I do not believe that the takedown needed to occur in an exact spot that was ravaged by fire.

It is unclear to me how much time it would take to execute an emergency demolition if the protocol were pre-planned and practiced.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– RichardNIxon2point0 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

But the buildings started collapsing right at the impact. Check here at 5:55. You can clearly see the top collapsing and the building beneath the impact not moving one bit until the top collides with it.

https://youtu.be/UVhhu5OjMf8?t=352

I just don't see any way to predict or pull this off without some magic.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Start of damage does not preclude or eliminate other co-existing causes of damage.

<incredibly stupid to think any wiring for bombs or even radio tranceivers would work after sitting in fires for hours>

Timers can and are made to be rugged. Further, local explosions of thermite within the infrastructure could easily have been timed to go off, or have been centrally wired to a detonator box preceding collapse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I think that someone had to go in and manually do something to make it happen.

Oh, I should also explain that one theory of mine is that buildings libel to cause epic catastrophes if they collapse sideways can be outfitted with the means by which to demolish them even as early as their initial construction. However, allowing this to be done by remote control is a risk they would never take, so it takes a crew to go in and enable the emergency takedown.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– RichardNIxon2point0 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Not even close. Look here at 3 minutes. You can see the top collapsing above the impact while everything below is 100% stationary. Tehre are also close up shots that make this even more apparent.

https://youtu.be/ft2uIYucsXo?t=183

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy