This scientist drops bombs in his (University of New Mexico, now approved) official religious exemption statement, including the Deep State’s depopulation agenda. The link to the statement (fully-scientifically referenced) is in the description of his video demonstrating how they are censoring him and potentially allowing a 3rd party to control communications between scientists at public universities. Crazy shit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl7I2KYvwcg
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
If we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death); then to believe (mentally affix) in true versus false information; represents ignorance of movement. Furthermore...believing information implies consenting by choice to suggestions by choice of others; which implies choice ignoring balance (balance defines choice; choice reacts to balance).
/u/free-will-of-choice bot is.
Anyway...if you proclaim what something "is" aren't you ignoring that you're within constant change (inception towards death); hence ignoring that whatever you proclaim is being changed? Why do you proclaim within constant change instead of adapting to change by choice of reaction?
/u/free-will-of-choice bot is.
Assumptions both huge and vague, a combination via which almost anything could be asserted.
A useful resource for your writing could be the Arty Bollocks Generator https://www.artybollocks.com/generator.html
If we are within constant movement; then we can only ever assume and never define; because any proclaimed definition would be changed by constant movement. Our assumptions are perceived as "vague"; because they represents our individual states of comprehension; which each of us builds through reacting by choice (free will) to balance within motion. Choice represents the reaction to balance; which is what choice chooses upon; yet we are tricked by others to ignore balance for their suggested choices; which we either believe or not believe. That choice vs choice (conflict of reason) in ignorance of balance.
To navigate as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) among assumptions upon constant change; requires us to be able to comprehend the foundation of this system aka the one thing that cannot change within constant change aka the laws of nature aka the rules that define how flow operates; which the resulting form within flow perceives the consequences thereof; reacts by choice for balance to, and grows ONEs comprehension about what ALL perceived means.
We can only assume; not define. Others suggest us words (spell-craft) as meaning for a system that does not name; bran; idolizes itself to communicate meaning; instead it moves us; which our senses perceive as inspiration to react to by choice for balance.
ASSERT', verb transitive [Latin assero, assertum, to claim or challenge, to maintain or assert; of ad and sero. The sense of sero is to sow, properly to throw or set. To assert is to throw or set firmly.] Flow asserts form; form reacts to flow. You were set into motion and now you need to resist flow to sustain your form temporarily aka adaptation.
Each ONE form comes out of ALL flow, for flow/form represent loss/growth of the same energy. Flow; loss represents velocity aka forward movement; Form; growth represents resistance aka balance within forward movement. Each of us represents temporary growth (potential) within ongoing loss (potentiality) of energy...the source of ALL information. We perceive moving information as inspiration to react to for self sustenance by choice of reaction.
In short...everything can be asserted; but for you to assert (to claim) represents the temptation to ignore reaction by choice for balance. Instead of growing form for sustenance; you try to hold onto flow, which destroys you, and our parasitic few exploit this ignorance by suggesting us to choose want over need...ignorance over adherence; temptation over self sustenance; death over life.
The many lack comprehension of this; because to choose to ignore reality for suggested fiction; corrupts their comprehension. If you consent to believe any suggestion by others; you perceive the world through the lens of those self imposed beliefs (-isms).
ALL already is combined as energy; the ONEs within represent segregated form within the segregating flow aka the momentum caused by motion aka the ever changing moment(um) we exist in and react by choice of free will to.
It represents offer/consent under natural law; exploited by choice of suggestion towards choice of submission to believe/not believe the suggestion of others. The author of the suggestion even mocks the ignorance of those who consent over and over to choose want over need...
The choice of want of the consenting reader is what constantly puts value upon what he consents to read by his choice of evaluation. This is what makes it bollocks; because choice of evaluation isn't about defining value; it represents ONEs choice based reaction to ALL value. ALL value is predefined within energy, and our free will of choice reacts to it by evaluating what inspires us for balancing; for self sustenance.
Energy represents the movement generator of itself...the loss of its potentiality (flow) causes the growth of potential (form) within. Both together (loss/growth) represent the coexisting natural opposites (balance) of self sustenance aka the energetic function of energy.