A theory I'm kicking around in my head lately is that maybe the reason Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin works so well in curing viral infection is because what is attributed to a 'virus' is in fact disease brought about from a parasitic infection.
What if the reason that no one has successfully isolated any virus is the simple fact that viruses don't actually exist, but are simply an expression of some type of genetic material from parasitic organisms, that causes disease in the infected host?
I haven't found anything on this theory online, so this is a call for input from my fellow theorists here in the hope that any of you guys have come across useful studies or literature on this subject.
Virus is a form of parasite. So anti parasitic should work in a general broad spectrum I would think
May be that the method of replication for viruses and parasites are similar enough.
Could be, yes.
No, literally it is....virus is a small form of cellular parasite
Yup. Viruses aren’t even alive. Just a prion pile waiting for a host. They’re the Anna Nicole Smiths of the microscopic natural world.
I’ve always wondered why fire isn’t considering a living organism. It’s carbon based, needs fuel, expels co2, has offspring...
Me like fire.
Fire good.
There has never been any evidence of a “virus” attaching to a cell and “infecting” it with it’s dna.
When you see, under a microscope, cells explode out with all sorts of smaller things, those are not viruses. They are the result of the cell undergoing internal changes in order to address the ailment that is afflicting it’s environment.
I wasnt trying to catch the OP in a gotcha....I was agreeing with him in addressing why the meds in question seem to be working is all. Have you seen sound vibrations explode cancer cells? I know unrelated....but your post reminded me of that.