Fun fact about 9/11 (and the london 7/7) - the airplane numbers are related to numbers that have meaning in thelema (93, 77, etc.) and there's one line that's very interesting about it too.
As for the towers: "The Perfect and the Perfect (before 2001/09/11) are One Perfect (after the rebuild) and not two; nay, are none! (future?)"
For some reason people here repeatedly mischaracterise what I write as being triggered. I think that's a rhetorical device to persuade others.
Anyway, one of the definitions of repugnant is: incompatible, inconsistent, opposed or contrary in character. So I've misused that word. Although numerology in my view is inconsistent with reality, it is not necessarily inconsistent with itself. I apologize. A better way to describe it would be the most illogical horseshit you could come up with. Because 3 million, 6th January = 9 (???) 369, so Ashli Babbitt is still alive.
You know what? I was actually right. Repugnant also means offensive, and that's exactly what your comment is.
And you have the audacity to say that I look like a shill? A government shill would forum slide discussion away from the fact that despite there being organized sit-ins in the congressional chambers for years, Michael Byrd ambushed Ashli Babbitt without warning and shot her dead. A government shill would post comments to make it look like this community is full of crazy people. Who on earth would I be working for?
through madness, one enters...
DIVIDE BY ZERO.
Fun fact about 9/11 (and the london 7/7) - the airplane numbers are related to numbers that have meaning in thelema (93, 77, etc.) and there's one line that's very interesting about it too.
As for the towers: "The Perfect and the Perfect (before 2001/09/11) are One Perfect (after the rebuild) and not two; nay, are none! (future?)"
http://www.thelemapedia.org/index.php/0%3D2 1+1=2=1=0.
Our buddies at the CIA seem to really like that date and these kind of numbers.
https://anarchoforteanist.wordpress.com/2017/11/05/the-occult-numerology-of-911-updated/
Ohhh. So it's basically the most repugnant horseshit you could come up with.
For some reason people here repeatedly mischaracterise what I write as being triggered. I think that's a rhetorical device to persuade others.
Anyway, one of the definitions of repugnant is: incompatible, inconsistent, opposed or contrary in character. So I've misused that word. Although numerology in my view is inconsistent with reality, it is not necessarily inconsistent with itself. I apologize. A better way to describe it would be the most illogical horseshit you could come up with. Because 3 million, 6th January = 9 (???) 369, so Ashli Babbitt is still alive.
You know what? I was actually right. Repugnant also means offensive, and that's exactly what your comment is.
And you have the audacity to say that I look like a shill? A government shill would forum slide discussion away from the fact that despite there being organized sit-ins in the congressional chambers for years, Michael Byrd ambushed Ashli Babbitt without warning and shot her dead. A government shill would post comments to make it look like this community is full of crazy people. Who on earth would I be working for?
Sorry this still doesn’t make sense. Why is January 27 in Pythagorean numerology?
So a being 1 makes sense, since it’s the first letter of the alphabet, yes? But why is, say, r=9? Or J also = 1