On anti vaccine, it is not a vaccine, it doesn't even work, but it lasts for approx 6 months.
What this stupid airlines is saying, employees will be subjected to whatever syringes of crap they force feed them. To be employed by Delta means you are their junkie guinea pigs.
They can't fine people. Take it to the Supreme Court. Delta simply aren't the law. Irregardless it is discrimination. The vaccine isn't law. No where in the constitution does it mandate vaccines. Infact to the contrary it specifically rejects them. Delta will be fined billions for forcing it. It is against the constitution freedom of religion, freedom of speech and so many more. Somebody else prove that this vaccine even offers immunity. It doesn't. Subjectively any lawsuit against Delta's unconstitutional criminality is worth billions. Take them to court.
I would still try and take it to the SC but it has effectively already been ruled on:
The US Supreme Court already decided that was a valid approach.
Justice Wendell Holmes ruled in Buck v Bell:
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.
In reviewing Indiana University mandate for students Judge Damon R. Leichty used the smallpox mandate case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, concluded, “In sum, the law today recognizes Jacobson as a precursor to rational basis review. This is consistent with statements of many justices who continue to acknowledge Jacobson as good law, albeit with constitutional restraint.”
Smallpox is a vastly different disease and very fatal. It doesn't have animal reservoirs either. But the vaccine is effective.
There is no justification with COVID. There has been no ruling. But importantly the vaccine is ineffective. It entails multiple vaccines, how many is the individual signing up too. But none provide immunization, unlike natural immunity, any efficacy is debatable while vaccinated still spread and contract the disease.
The SC haven't ruled. There is no lawful presidence for these vaccines. None whatsoever outside of emergency powers granting them. There has been no court ruling. There has been an assumption which hasn't been reviewed by law. An artificial assumption that these vaccines have provided vaccination, when infact they absolutely have not, and contrarily they need continued vaccination, how many nobody can say, how effective guesswork, how badly can they affect an individual's health a roll of the dice. But not once have they been through court.
Obedience will be punished, resistance will be punished.
Like passenger airlines will still be a thing bar a small group of elites?
On anti vaccine, it is not a vaccine, it doesn't even work, but it lasts for approx 6 months.
What this stupid airlines is saying, employees will be subjected to whatever syringes of crap they force feed them. To be employed by Delta means you are their junkie guinea pigs.
They can't fine people. Take it to the Supreme Court. Delta simply aren't the law. Irregardless it is discrimination. The vaccine isn't law. No where in the constitution does it mandate vaccines. Infact to the contrary it specifically rejects them. Delta will be fined billions for forcing it. It is against the constitution freedom of religion, freedom of speech and so many more. Somebody else prove that this vaccine even offers immunity. It doesn't. Subjectively any lawsuit against Delta's unconstitutional criminality is worth billions. Take them to court.
I would still try and take it to the SC but it has effectively already been ruled on:
The US Supreme Court already decided that was a valid approach.
Justice Wendell Holmes ruled in Buck v Bell:
https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/14/why-buck-v-bell-still-matters/
In reviewing Indiana University mandate for students Judge Damon R. Leichty used the smallpox mandate case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, concluded, “In sum, the law today recognizes Jacobson as a precursor to rational basis review. This is consistent with statements of many justices who continue to acknowledge Jacobson as good law, albeit with constitutional restraint.”
https://electionwiz.com/2021/07/20/the-dark-road-of-forced-jabs-weve-been-here-before-it-didnt-end-well/
Smallpox is a vastly different disease and very fatal. It doesn't have animal reservoirs either. But the vaccine is effective.
There is no justification with COVID. There has been no ruling. But importantly the vaccine is ineffective. It entails multiple vaccines, how many is the individual signing up too. But none provide immunization, unlike natural immunity, any efficacy is debatable while vaccinated still spread and contract the disease.
The SC haven't ruled. There is no lawful presidence for these vaccines. None whatsoever outside of emergency powers granting them. There has been no court ruling. There has been an assumption which hasn't been reviewed by law. An artificial assumption that these vaccines have provided vaccination, when infact they absolutely have not, and contrarily they need continued vaccination, how many nobody can say, how effective guesswork, how badly can they affect an individual's health a roll of the dice. But not once have they been through court.
There is no example you can provided.