they literally say nothing of value in this video, dont show any facts or actual research, they just keep rambling about "vaccines bad, its mass genocide, we need to do something!"
while i agree that the covid vaccine is unusual and actual science has shown it to do more harm than good, videos like these talking about "metallic substances in vaccines" are just bad for optics. it makes us look like retarded tinfoil heads that think the government wants to mindcontrol us with the jab and 5g technology. look at some actual science like:
THIS IS MOSTLY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE GOVERNMENT FUNDED RESEARCH. THESE ARE ACTUAL FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS FROM ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND NOT SOME ESOTERICS RAMBLING LESS COHERENT BULLSHIT IN FRONT OF A MICROSCOPE THAN BIDEN IN A PRESSCONFERENCE!
Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population...Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.
yes i know, i post these links basically everywhere and try to convince people to actually take a look into REAL SCIENCE other than trusting the experts. i hope i have already convinced quite some people with that
Microscope analysis looks like another valid avenue to pursue so don't write it off too quickly. You basically said they didn't provide enough analysis. Well, that could be the editor\s fault or the interviewers fault for not asking more questions.
Considering you don't know these people, their credentials or if they have published or will publish their results, who are you to say whether they are doing "actual science" or not?
I have no qualms about sharing this information, I do wish the original uploader provided credit / details about who they are, but it can be inferred the woman with the microscope does this analysis for a living, and some of the men are doctors based on their comments.
they literally say nothing of value in this video, dont show any facts or actual research, they just keep rambling about "vaccines bad, its mass genocide, we need to do something!"
while i agree that the covid vaccine is unusual and actual science has shown it to do more harm than good, videos like these talking about "metallic substances in vaccines" are just bad for optics. it makes us look like retarded tinfoil heads that think the government wants to mindcontrol us with the jab and 5g technology. look at some actual science like:
vaccines and ADE: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
in animal trials covid vaccines caused organ damages https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525089/
the spike protein in covid and the vaccine can initiate aggregation of neurodegeneration in the brain https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988450/
SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and Lewy bodies, a hallmark for Parkinson, after an asymptomatic infection in macaques. https://21a86421-c3e0-461b-83c2-cfe4628dfadc.filesusr.com/ugd/659775_ebca38540f7e4273a73e6b6e26a51be0.pdf
vaccination during pregnancy causes "spontaneous abortion" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/
imperfect vaccines make the virus mutate faster and stronger https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516275/
THIS IS MOSTLY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE GOVERNMENT FUNDED RESEARCH. THESE ARE ACTUAL FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS FROM ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND NOT SOME ESOTERICS RAMBLING LESS COHERENT BULLSHIT IN FRONT OF A MICROSCOPE THAN BIDEN IN A PRESSCONFERENCE!
Your last link is very important.
yes i know, i post these links basically everywhere and try to convince people to actually take a look into REAL SCIENCE other than trusting the experts. i hope i have already convinced quite some people with that
Microscope analysis looks like another valid avenue to pursue so don't write it off too quickly. You basically said they didn't provide enough analysis. Well, that could be the editor\s fault or the interviewers fault for not asking more questions.
Considering you don't know these people, their credentials or if they have published or will publish their results, who are you to say whether they are doing "actual science" or not?
I have no qualms about sharing this information, I do wish the original uploader provided credit / details about who they are, but it can be inferred the woman with the microscope does this analysis for a living, and some of the men are doctors based on their comments.