Others have said this as well, that people are putting fake data into the hand of Lindell, and have shown that there is some sketchy stuff in that "Absolute Proof" video when he shows the database with vote manipulations.
The most provable voter fraud is the 3 a.m. vote dumps on camera of multiple scans of mail in ballots for Biden. If you can prove that to the public, and we have, then you've won your case. About 33-52% of the public according to opinion polls thinks that Biden only won through fraud. The result is a tightening of voter ID laws, etc.
Admittedly, the cyber hacking of the machines is a more difficult thing to prove. However, if you prove that, then we have to radically re-work elections in the US to go back to the punch cards of the early 2000s.
Personally, I think that there was hacking of the machines, and a lot of close races over the years were won by whomever ponied up the $ to the right people. I don't think the uni-party wants to give that option up.
In the 1960 election, Nixon called the voting into question.
S sample audit in one district was performed before JFK's inauguration and the results were "something seems amiss, we'll do a wider sample after the inaug."
So the second sample was processed "yep, definitely not right" and the GOP were "nah, we'll leave it" because Eisenhower blamed Nixon for a bad campaign, especially the famous debate.
Nixon didn't fight the 1960 steal because he thought the country would be ungovernable, even if he won the fight. He wasn't wrong I think.
The difference in 1960s, though, was that downstate IL used to stuff the ballot box to counter act Chicago's dead rising from the river to vote. Mayer Daley, an old hand at this, waited until the last minute so that downstate counties couldn't make up for his votes. At that point, he knew exactly how much to produce a win. You only get one bite at the apple in a normal election. COVID let them do the vote dump, and then keep doing whatever they needed to for a week or more to get what they needed to produce a Biden "win".
If I were Trump, I'd be working with rural red counties to stuff the ballot box myself.
There's also old school tradecraft used by cartographers and intelligence agencies. You can subtly alter text, maps,images so that you can track versions to see who leaks/steals/copies. Mapmakers do it with an invented feature, say a street that's fictitious. With text you can change kern, font, punctuation in just one part etc.. And you will not know you have tagged data so a pro wouldn't show all their cards. But bless our recovered crack head, he needs to tag in others at this point because if you get burned somebody else runs the torch while others tunnel under the enemy castle. The sort of people who should have been on this work for Palantir or DIA or the Admiral who warned 45.
He can't set up a proper e-commerce website. Of course all the material was handed to him. It's a trap. It's like when the media said all dissidents were Qtards and then some normies defended the Qtards hard.
So sometimes a person's heart is in the right place and they have guts and zeal, but they don't realize what the right will entail. I don't fault the man if he's sincere.
Others have said this as well, that people are putting fake data into the hand of Lindell, and have shown that there is some sketchy stuff in that "Absolute Proof" video when he shows the database with vote manipulations.
The most provable voter fraud is the 3 a.m. vote dumps on camera of multiple scans of mail in ballots for Biden. If you can prove that to the public, and we have, then you've won your case. About 33-52% of the public according to opinion polls thinks that Biden only won through fraud. The result is a tightening of voter ID laws, etc.
Admittedly, the cyber hacking of the machines is a more difficult thing to prove. However, if you prove that, then we have to radically re-work elections in the US to go back to the punch cards of the early 2000s.
Personally, I think that there was hacking of the machines, and a lot of close races over the years were won by whomever ponied up the $ to the right people. I don't think the uni-party wants to give that option up.
In the 1960 election, Nixon called the voting into question.
S sample audit in one district was performed before JFK's inauguration and the results were "something seems amiss, we'll do a wider sample after the inaug."
So the second sample was processed "yep, definitely not right" and the GOP were "nah, we'll leave it" because Eisenhower blamed Nixon for a bad campaign, especially the famous debate.
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/133484
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/164266
Illinois did the 3am vote dump tactic
https://sci-hub.st/10.2307/27550168
Nixon didn't fight the 1960 steal because he thought the country would be ungovernable, even if he won the fight. He wasn't wrong I think.
The difference in 1960s, though, was that downstate IL used to stuff the ballot box to counter act Chicago's dead rising from the river to vote. Mayer Daley, an old hand at this, waited until the last minute so that downstate counties couldn't make up for his votes. At that point, he knew exactly how much to produce a win. You only get one bite at the apple in a normal election. COVID let them do the vote dump, and then keep doing whatever they needed to for a week or more to get what they needed to produce a Biden "win".
If I were Trump, I'd be working with rural red counties to stuff the ballot box myself.
lindell is stealing too much revenue from jones.
money talks.
There's also old school tradecraft used by cartographers and intelligence agencies. You can subtly alter text, maps,images so that you can track versions to see who leaks/steals/copies. Mapmakers do it with an invented feature, say a street that's fictitious. With text you can change kern, font, punctuation in just one part etc.. And you will not know you have tagged data so a pro wouldn't show all their cards. But bless our recovered crack head, he needs to tag in others at this point because if you get burned somebody else runs the torch while others tunnel under the enemy castle. The sort of people who should have been on this work for Palantir or DIA or the Admiral who warned 45.
Anyone who watched the event knows he has the goods and tons of proof of the fraud.
The PCAPS issue is a small issue. The PCAPS exist.
The data is real.
We are at war, you can trust anything being done.
https://files.catbox.moe/3e48n8.mp4
He can't set up a proper e-commerce website. Of course all the material was handed to him. It's a trap. It's like when the media said all dissidents were Qtards and then some normies defended the Qtards hard.
So sometimes a person's heart is in the right place and they have guts and zeal, but they don't realize what the right will entail. I don't fault the man if he's sincere.
Agreed. I absolutely love him, and I want him to win, but I can also see the powers that be feeding him false data to try to muddy the waters.