If there would be cataclysm you shouldn't leave some stupid instructions "to govern" but rather atomistic theory/bohr model + data about earth and math + some other basic data including linguistic "rosetta stone" + clues related to compatibile technology allowing after reaching proper technological level to decode and read data ark.
Do you know the difference between governing, and guidance?
I would say the guidances are to start the survivors away from the general causes of problems I. The world, or at least how whoever made them saw it, so that the world would not go right back to where it is now.
Whether I think it is worthwhile or the right guidance is not what I'm arguing, just that none of it seems like NWO ideology.
If there would be cataclysm you shouldn't leave some stupid instructions "to govern" but rather atomistic theory/bohr model + data about earth and math + some other basic data including linguistic "rosetta stone" + clues related to compatibile technology allowing after reaching proper technological level to decode and read data ark.
More like pyramids than this shit.
Do you know the difference between governing, and guidance?
I would say the guidances are to start the survivors away from the general causes of problems I. The world, or at least how whoever made them saw it, so that the world would not go right back to where it is now.
Whether I think it is worthwhile or the right guidance is not what I'm arguing, just that none of it seems like NWO ideology.
First is forced,second is voluntary.But I doubt to many people would voluntarily accept such "guidance"...