Which exploits what? Choice of ignorance over adherence to self sustenance aka want over need. The few exploit offer/consent under natural law by using suggestion to mimic offer towards consent by free will of choice. What do they use to suggest? Their free will of choice; hence the many being deceived to choose upon the suggested choices of others; while ignoring to use choice upon the balance that defines having choice.
They came out in the open less than two years ago
The many are being farmed for their ignorance by the few since way before religions (to bind anew) industrialized control by suggestion. "in the open" represents your comprehension to notice what was always there; for nature doesn't hide what it offers, and only the want of the many for information allows the few to wield secrecy against those who ignore inspiration for suggested information.
say nations should be no more
That represents the implication of United Nations; because to unite the people (nation) destroys their habitats.
they openly sell the ideas of One World Government (OWG) and great reset.
a) flow to form (inception) and form to flow (death) represents the foundation of the "great reset".
b) ALL being ONE in energy represents the foundation of the "One World"; while govern/control and ment; from mens/mind represents the ignorance of the many who consent to the suggestions of the few.
c) selling ideas (perception) implies what? Suggestion towards choice of ignorance. Also; what does selling a One World Government imply? Having control over the entire world as a marketplace to sell that idea to all those within.
d) if they sell perception; how are you paying? Could it be consent by free will of choice; which then builds your comprehension? But wait...you already consented to the suggested One World Government by choosing to not want it; which is why you now comprehend in accordance to what the few suggested you as perception (ideas); instead of ALL each ONE perceives (moving inspiration).
If you side with them you are the enemy
a) your consent to believe in true vs false represents the conflict (reason) you perceive reality as. That conflict does not exist outside your mind.
b) the few suggest to cause conflict (reason); then contradict reason to sustain conflict (talmudic reasoning). You consent to suggestion aka consent to conflict; because you want to believe in true vs false; which is why you now perceive reality as conflict and everyone as potential "enemies".
Ask yourself this...does any other life-form qualify as being your "enemy" within the conflict of reason (true versus false)? If not; could it be that nature doesn't offer any reason for a conflict between true and false information; since nature doesn't offer either?
In short...you choosing conflict + the few choosing to suggest conflict = the same side (conflict). The other side represents self sustenance; which makes conflict the choice of ignorance.
This is what matters, not your one all bullshit.
What does matter represent? Form. Which implies what? Being formed within flow. Now pinch yourself...that's form; which within flow implies you representing what? ONE within ALL.
To use implies reacting to what's offered; and to offer implies reacting as form to what flow offers. Proclaiming as form to other form what anything "is" represents a suggestion to ignore what flow represents...constant change.
Within constant change you cannot define what anything is; only react to it aka adaptation by choice of reaction.
your philosophy
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want perception. We already have perception, and we need to adapt to it; while resisting the want to believe the suggestions of others about what it means.
the matter at hand
You want order out of chaos aka wining the us vs them conflict you consent to believe exists. Meanwhile in reality...we represent chaos (temporary form) out of order (ongoing flow).
You're tricked by parasites to go along with the flow towards death; while ignoring the self sustenance of life. You see this all around you...order followers aka the ignorant following the will of others within a chain of command. It doesn't matter if it's military; religion; politics, entertainment; education; organized crime; sports; finance etc. These represent all different pens for the same ignorance racket; which exploits offer/consent under natural law.
An example...the few suggest their blood libel/human sacrifice ritual to the many as the idol called "abortion". Those who by free will of choice consent to believe it are then labeled by the idol "pro-choice" and those who consent by free will of choice to not believe it are labeled "pro-life".
Both sides are then stuck within the conflict of reason aka true vs false (with each side believing they represents truth and the others the liars. This fictitious conflict of reason is running in its hamster-wheel of utter ignorance for over half a century; while the blood libel/human sacrifice ritual runs completely undisturbed thanks to the ignorance of both sides. Even worse...the few showcase the ignorance of the many for all with eyes to see by branding the conflict as "choice versus life"; when in reality "life equals free will of choice".
Your systematic eradication through the suggestions of the few represents a response to your own choice of ignorance. There's no versus within energy; no true vs false conflict; no other matter at hand than self sustenance as form within flow by choice within balance.
Why does every other life-form perceive; comprehend and adapt by choice to "grass"; without anyone telling them what "grass" means?
What if not suggested words define meaning; but the movement that our senses perceive? To see; hear; taste; feel, and smell grass is based on perceiving movement; which communicates inspiration; out of which we build comprehension.
Can you hear before you comprehend your first word? If yes; then didn't your existence have meaning before the suggested words of others define for you what it means?
Which exploits what? Choice of ignorance over adherence to self sustenance aka want over need. The few exploit offer/consent under natural law by using suggestion to mimic offer towards consent by free will of choice. What do they use to suggest? Their free will of choice; hence the many being deceived to choose upon the suggested choices of others; while ignoring to use choice upon the balance that defines having choice.
The many are being farmed for their ignorance by the few since way before religions (to bind anew) industrialized control by suggestion. "in the open" represents your comprehension to notice what was always there; for nature doesn't hide what it offers, and only the want of the many for information allows the few to wield secrecy against those who ignore inspiration for suggested information.
That represents the implication of United Nations; because to unite the people (nation) destroys their habitats.
a) flow to form (inception) and form to flow (death) represents the foundation of the "great reset".
b) ALL being ONE in energy represents the foundation of the "One World"; while govern/control and ment; from mens/mind represents the ignorance of the many who consent to the suggestions of the few.
c) selling ideas (perception) implies what? Suggestion towards choice of ignorance. Also; what does selling a One World Government imply? Having control over the entire world as a marketplace to sell that idea to all those within.
d) if they sell perception; how are you paying? Could it be consent by free will of choice; which then builds your comprehension? But wait...you already consented to the suggested One World Government by choosing to not want it; which is why you now comprehend in accordance to what the few suggested you as perception (ideas); instead of ALL each ONE perceives (moving inspiration).
a) your consent to believe in true vs false represents the conflict (reason) you perceive reality as. That conflict does not exist outside your mind.
b) the few suggest to cause conflict (reason); then contradict reason to sustain conflict (talmudic reasoning). You consent to suggestion aka consent to conflict; because you want to believe in true vs false; which is why you now perceive reality as conflict and everyone as potential "enemies".
Ask yourself this...does any other life-form qualify as being your "enemy" within the conflict of reason (true versus false)? If not; could it be that nature doesn't offer any reason for a conflict between true and false information; since nature doesn't offer either?
In short...you choosing conflict + the few choosing to suggest conflict = the same side (conflict). The other side represents self sustenance; which makes conflict the choice of ignorance.
What does matter represent? Form. Which implies what? Being formed within flow. Now pinch yourself...that's form; which within flow implies you representing what? ONE within ALL.
Your use of both represent and implies is simply incorrect.
None of your philosophy speaks to the matter at hand.
To use implies reacting to what's offered; and to offer implies reacting as form to what flow offers. Proclaiming as form to other form what anything "is" represents a suggestion to ignore what flow represents...constant change.
Within constant change you cannot define what anything is; only react to it aka adaptation by choice of reaction.
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want perception. We already have perception, and we need to adapt to it; while resisting the want to believe the suggestions of others about what it means.
You want order out of chaos aka wining the us vs them conflict you consent to believe exists. Meanwhile in reality...we represent chaos (temporary form) out of order (ongoing flow).
You're tricked by parasites to go along with the flow towards death; while ignoring the self sustenance of life. You see this all around you...order followers aka the ignorant following the will of others within a chain of command. It doesn't matter if it's military; religion; politics, entertainment; education; organized crime; sports; finance etc. These represent all different pens for the same ignorance racket; which exploits offer/consent under natural law.
An example...the few suggest their blood libel/human sacrifice ritual to the many as the idol called "abortion". Those who by free will of choice consent to believe it are then labeled by the idol "pro-choice" and those who consent by free will of choice to not believe it are labeled "pro-life".
Both sides are then stuck within the conflict of reason aka true vs false (with each side believing they represents truth and the others the liars. This fictitious conflict of reason is running in its hamster-wheel of utter ignorance for over half a century; while the blood libel/human sacrifice ritual runs completely undisturbed thanks to the ignorance of both sides. Even worse...the few showcase the ignorance of the many for all with eyes to see by branding the conflict as "choice versus life"; when in reality "life equals free will of choice".
Your systematic eradication through the suggestions of the few represents a response to your own choice of ignorance. There's no versus within energy; no true vs false conflict; no other matter at hand than self sustenance as form within flow by choice within balance.
No it doesn't. Really. No such implication is made.
These words may mean something to you, but without creating an entirely new language it's just word salad.
Words mean things.
Why does every other life-form perceive; comprehend and adapt by choice to "grass"; without anyone telling them what "grass" means?
What if not suggested words define meaning; but the movement that our senses perceive? To see; hear; taste; feel, and smell grass is based on perceiving movement; which communicates inspiration; out of which we build comprehension.
Can you hear before you comprehend your first word? If yes; then didn't your existence have meaning before the suggested words of others define for you what it means?
Where does nature use words to brand itself?