To use implies reacting to what's offered; and to offer implies reacting as form to what flow offers. Proclaiming as form to other form what anything "is" represents a suggestion to ignore what flow represents...constant change.
Within constant change you cannot define what anything is; only react to it aka adaptation by choice of reaction.
your philosophy
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want perception. We already have perception, and we need to adapt to it; while resisting the want to believe the suggestions of others about what it means.
the matter at hand
You want order out of chaos aka wining the us vs them conflict you consent to believe exists. Meanwhile in reality...we represent chaos (temporary form) out of order (ongoing flow).
You're tricked by parasites to go along with the flow towards death; while ignoring the self sustenance of life. You see this all around you...order followers aka the ignorant following the will of others within a chain of command. It doesn't matter if it's military; religion; politics, entertainment; education; organized crime; sports; finance etc. These represent all different pens for the same ignorance racket; which exploits offer/consent under natural law.
An example...the few suggest their blood libel/human sacrifice ritual to the many as the idol called "abortion". Those who by free will of choice consent to believe it are then labeled by the idol "pro-choice" and those who consent by free will of choice to not believe it are labeled "pro-life".
Both sides are then stuck within the conflict of reason aka true vs false (with each side believing they represents truth and the others the liars. This fictitious conflict of reason is running in its hamster-wheel of utter ignorance for over half a century; while the blood libel/human sacrifice ritual runs completely undisturbed thanks to the ignorance of both sides. Even worse...the few showcase the ignorance of the many for all with eyes to see by branding the conflict as "choice versus life"; when in reality "life equals free will of choice".
Your systematic eradication through the suggestions of the few represents a response to your own choice of ignorance. There's no versus within energy; no true vs false conflict; no other matter at hand than self sustenance as form within flow by choice within balance.
Why does every other life-form perceive; comprehend and adapt by choice to "grass"; without anyone telling them what "grass" means?
What if not suggested words define meaning; but the movement that our senses perceive? To see; hear; taste; feel, and smell grass is based on perceiving movement; which communicates inspiration; out of which we build comprehension.
Can you hear before you comprehend your first word? If yes; then didn't your existence have meaning before the suggested words of others define for you what it means?
Your use of both represent and implies is simply incorrect.
None of your philosophy speaks to the matter at hand.
To use implies reacting to what's offered; and to offer implies reacting as form to what flow offers. Proclaiming as form to other form what anything "is" represents a suggestion to ignore what flow represents...constant change.
Within constant change you cannot define what anything is; only react to it aka adaptation by choice of reaction.
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. love, to love, and wisdom.] aka to want perception. We already have perception, and we need to adapt to it; while resisting the want to believe the suggestions of others about what it means.
You want order out of chaos aka wining the us vs them conflict you consent to believe exists. Meanwhile in reality...we represent chaos (temporary form) out of order (ongoing flow).
You're tricked by parasites to go along with the flow towards death; while ignoring the self sustenance of life. You see this all around you...order followers aka the ignorant following the will of others within a chain of command. It doesn't matter if it's military; religion; politics, entertainment; education; organized crime; sports; finance etc. These represent all different pens for the same ignorance racket; which exploits offer/consent under natural law.
An example...the few suggest their blood libel/human sacrifice ritual to the many as the idol called "abortion". Those who by free will of choice consent to believe it are then labeled by the idol "pro-choice" and those who consent by free will of choice to not believe it are labeled "pro-life".
Both sides are then stuck within the conflict of reason aka true vs false (with each side believing they represents truth and the others the liars. This fictitious conflict of reason is running in its hamster-wheel of utter ignorance for over half a century; while the blood libel/human sacrifice ritual runs completely undisturbed thanks to the ignorance of both sides. Even worse...the few showcase the ignorance of the many for all with eyes to see by branding the conflict as "choice versus life"; when in reality "life equals free will of choice".
Your systematic eradication through the suggestions of the few represents a response to your own choice of ignorance. There's no versus within energy; no true vs false conflict; no other matter at hand than self sustenance as form within flow by choice within balance.
No it doesn't. Really. No such implication is made.
These words may mean something to you, but without creating an entirely new language it's just word salad.
Words mean things.
Why does every other life-form perceive; comprehend and adapt by choice to "grass"; without anyone telling them what "grass" means?
What if not suggested words define meaning; but the movement that our senses perceive? To see; hear; taste; feel, and smell grass is based on perceiving movement; which communicates inspiration; out of which we build comprehension.
Can you hear before you comprehend your first word? If yes; then didn't your existence have meaning before the suggested words of others define for you what it means?
Where does nature use words to brand itself?
Step away from the bong.