Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
KennyLiquorbush 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder. It certainly seems like they are trying to create an actual insurrection, so that they can declare a perpetual state of emergency, officially suspend the Constitution, and disarm us. For certain, they're ramping up their surveillance of the masses, most likely to identify future dissenters and to prevent organization.

On the other hand, when you look at the numbers and their geographic vulnerabilities, you see how tenuous their hold on power really is. If widespread protests occured the US, like we are seeing in Europe, it's questionable whether they could maintain power. The only thing preventing unrest in US is the high standard of living, but they seem to be determined to collapse the economy, so that won't likely last.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
slowjellyfish 2 points ago +3 / -1

The Dems can't maintain power. They are going to lose the midterms -- that's approximately a year away. I think the Dems are grasping at straws trying to find a solution to their mess...

AngeredKabar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol, voting.

slowjellyfish 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you do suggest? Protest at the capital? Make sure to bring grandma (they surely wouldn't put her in jail).

With all the new voting laws; I see a more fair election next cycle. Elections have to start locally and since most people are not cheaters. Get enough fair people involved and concerned, and things will change. I dare say, things have already been put into motion. We wouldn't see the fruits of our labor for another year or so. It's about getting information out there. Getting the normies to see through the fake media.

KennyLiquorbush 4 points ago +4 / -0

As the last "election" proved, the voters are irrelevant. Welcome to SorosRothschildBloombergistan!

slowjellyfish 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, last "election" only proved democrats are willing to steal an election.

GG8782 1 point ago +1 / -0