Who Paid for the Last Supper and With What Money?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
He never resurrected, it was added into a later canonization. It was added in order to prove he wasn't mortal, immaculate babies with Kings claiming their rights of the first night and killing all potential heirs left Thomas's. So that indeed there was this other ethreal realm that the Egyptians could charge a passage into upon any canonization.
The original print didn't have a resurrection. It was added after the followers fighting for more than a century lost to other believers. These believers stripped away his wife and even Thomas from the testaments but added even more disciples to the new testament. He never had 12 disciples either. The actual number remains contentious.
I never claimed he resurrected. My account allows for a journey East to his final resting place.
I am simply taking doctrine, and Questioning, how actual humans would behave, applying realistic motivations to the stories.
I didn't or otherwise. I simply commented, regarding truths that remain hidden. What is the truth becomes the question? Did he even exist and who was he? Belief is in the mind of the believer. It is called faith, where it therefore simply accepts indoctrination.
Massive debate on if he existed, or was it simply another story retold. It was certainly rewritten. If he existed who was he, how much truth is there in what he supposedly did. Of course Christianity assumed paganism, holding Christ's birth and death on pagan celebrations. What of its origin. Mithraism older of Greek origin is related to Christianity and possibly an even older sect away from what was then the paradigm of religion has many comparisons that are strikingly similar in beliefs and certain lore to Christainity. Mithrias followers were persecuted by the other gods for their worship in Catacombs also has a mortal who resurrected.