So I’ve been looking into this for a few weeks. It’s hard to to explore the globe earth theory as all debunkers are jack asses who responses are basically if you don’t know physics you’re a retard and I can’t help you lol. My conclusion so far is NASA is definitely lying about shit and in reality it seems like their is a lot of people who will never be convinced of a globe unless they can see a curve for them selves. Honestly why do globe defenders get so bent out of shape if it’s such a stupid thing to think the earth is flat. If I was arguing with an idiot I wouldn’t even entertain them. What is the purpose of people pushing flat earth. Flat earthers definitely give a reason to why globe theory is pushed so hard. I would like see some level headed debunkers that can actually explain to a normal person why flat earth is wrong and answers to their questions. I find plenty of explanation for flat earth that answers alot of what global theory people say debunk flat earth.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Please send a link to any official gunnery table documents making this claim of accounting for the rotation of the earth, otherwise I will claim this to be untrue as I have looked into this and found no such evidence. Thank you
https://www.mathscinotes.com/2017/12/earths-curvature-and-battleship-gunnery/
This page gives a good breakdown on the math and redoing the tables. He includes his sources and provides his math. You’re welcome.
https://eugeneleeslover.com/USN-GUNS-AND-RANGE-TABLES/OP-770-1.html
Navy Department Bureau of Ordnance Bureau of Ordnance Circular Letter No. F8-43 Date: 2 September 1943 Subject: Range Ballistic Corrections due to rotation and curvature of the earth—method of handling
Fifth scan down on the page given.
Eugeneleeslover.com ? Lmao I'm not clicking that or trusting that source. Nice try though
I listed the page as the source for the scanned material you asked for. I also gave you the bureau of ordnance letter number itself as well as the date. You are free of course to request the document officially yourself or search for a scan of it on a website you do trust.
Was a shit source let's just be honest here. Am looking for the archived version but not finding any for that date with the corresponding letter number. If this is the only one out there and it's only available by some request or by using eugeneleeslover.com..... give me a break. It should be archived somewhere, or literally there should be a dozen or more other documents with similar or different explanations. This should be a widely available standardized instructions used in many applications, however it is not.
Now we're sitting here and you're referencing a document we can only find on a fringe unofficial website.
Nonetheless even if it did exist here, that is no proof it is practiced or applicable, there's no proof this is used, and actually there is too much proof that it is not used.
Snipers take everything into account, however they do not account for which direction they are facing because the Earth's rotation will affect them..
The Coriolis effect is the most ridiculous "proof" of spin, mainly because it does not exist, if it did, you should be able to test and prove this in an endless amount of experiments, however you can't.
Even if a ordnance letter number suggests it, this does not prove it is practiced. If it did, you should be able to prove this yourself with any apparatus thrown or shot into the air.