Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
Why is the assumption graphene and not self-assembling magnetite?
Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Then you're talking about self-assembling magnetite through iron oxide, not graphene. Where is your data?
The magnetic vaccine has luciferase that is held by magnetite formed through iron oxide.
https://youtu.be/SIIes052B4E
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.